The limit does indeed exist.(Original post by IrrationalRoot)
STEP II 1992 Q1
(iii) Don't get this one. Solutions say it's 0, which yeah ok at first glance you'd think that, but I thought becomes a indeterminate form every and so it appears that we do not have:
'for every such that .
Now I don't know whether there is a subtle extension to this limit to infinity definition that takes into account the domain of the function but I would think that this shows that the limit doesn't exist, which is what I put.
Also I have to say the last limit (vi) was really tough especially after than many easy limits.
Take e>0. For any positive x, f(x) <= 2pi/x. Now choose N=2pi/e so that for all x>N, we have  f(x)  <= 2pi/x < e. Done.
Posted from TSR Mobile
You are Here:
Home
> Forums
>< Study Help
>< Maths, science and technology academic help
>< Maths
>< Maths Exams

STEP Prep Thread 2016 (Mark. II)
Announcements  Posted on  

TSR's new app is coming! Sign up here to try it first >>  17102016 

 Follow
 421
 05062016 10:32

 Follow
 422
 05062016 11:28
(Original post by IrrationalRoot)
This line requires parity considerations I believe.
Reason being is you can't just arbitrarily pair off terms and use the proven result (ii). You need to consider how the terms pair off in the middle.
That's why the ms approach was a bit more complicated.Spoiler:ShowS=1^{k}+2^{k}+...+n^{k}
so S=(n(n1))^{k }+(n(n2))^{k}+...+(n1)^{k}+(n0)^{k}
(n(n1))^{k} + (n1)^{k} is divisible by n by (ii)
and (n(n2))^{k} + (n2)^{k }is divisible by n as well
so if we add (n1)^{k}+(n2)^{k}+...+1^{k}+0^{k }(Sn^{k})to S
it would be like
(n(n1))^{k} + (n1)^{k}+ (n(n2))^{k} + (n2)^{k}+....+ (n1)^{k}+1^{k}+ n^{k}
which should be divisible by n as well since each term(in different colours) is divisible by n
so 2Sn^{k} is divisible by n, which should be true for both even and odd n
and if n is odd, S has to be divisible by n because 2 is not a factor of n
and if n is even, S then would be divisible by n/2
Could you please explain why it doesn't work again, thank youLast edited by charlielao; 05062016 at 12:25. 
 Follow
 423
 05062016 12:12
(Original post by Ecasx)
The limit does indeed exist.
Take e>0. For any positive x, f(x) <= 2pi/x. Now choose N=2pi/e so that for all x>N, we have  f(x)  <= 2pi/x < e. Done.
Posted from TSR Mobile 
 Follow
 424
 05062016 12:23
(Original post by Zacken)
What's the point of taking f(x) <= 2pi/x? I mean, it works... but why not just f(x) <= 1/x?
Just using the definition with L = 0. 
 Follow
 425
 05062016 12:25
(Original post by Zacken)
What's the point of taking f(x) <= 2pi/x? I mean, it works... but why not just f(x) <= 1/x?
My mistake, max[sinx] = 1 not 2pi.
Posted from TSR Mobile 
 Follow
 426
 05062016 12:27
(Original post by Ecasx)
Take modulus of f since that's the definition of the limit.
My mistake, max[sinx] = 1 not 2pi.(Original post by EricPiphany)
To exclude the possibility that it tends to a negative limit.
Just using the definition with L = 0. 
 Follow
 427
 05062016 12:31
(Original post by Zacken)
Yeah, sorry, forgot the modulus. Was wondering why 2pi instead of 1. 
 Follow
 428
 05062016 12:50
(Original post by charlielao)
Thank you for your response, I finally understand the way marksheme uses. but I didn't pair up anything as in the marksheme though. Could you please take a look again since I made it a bit clearer for what i did. Or do I have to do exactly the same as the markscheme to get any mark.Spoiler:ShowS=1^{k}+2^{k}+...+n^{k}
so S=(n(n1))^{k }+(n(n2))^{k}+...+(n1)^{k}+(n0)^{k}
(n(n1))^{k} + (n1)^{k} is divisible by n by (ii)
and (n(n2))^{k} + (n2)^{k }is divisible by n as well
so if we add (n1)^{k}+(n2)^{k}+...+1^{k}+0^{k }(Sn^{k})to S
it would be like
(n(n1))^{k} + (n1)^{k}+ (n(n2))^{k} + (n2)^{k}+....+ (n1)^{k}+1^{k}+ n^{k}
which should be divisible by n as well since each term(in different colours) is divisible by n
so 2Sn^{k} is divisible by n, which should be true for both even and odd n
and if n is odd, S has to be divisible by n because 2 is not a factor of n
and if n is even, S then would be divisible by n/2
Could you please explain why it doesn't work again, thank you 
 Follow
 429
 05062016 12:53
Did STEP II 2015 and failed miserably, makes me realise how bad I am at maths. Probably gonna fail all my STEP exams.

 Follow
 430
 05062016 12:55
(Original post by IrrationalRoot)
Did STEP II 2015 and failed miserably, makes me realise how bad I am at maths. Probably gonna fail all my STEP exams.
You gkt this mate, boundaries were low for the 1 , lower then normal.
Spoiler:Show
Did you manage the integral?
Try Q2 it is trivial honestly like GCSE level.

 Follow
 431
 05062016 13:13
(Original post by physicsmaths)
Dw!
You gkt this mate, boundaries were low for the 1 , lower then normal.Spoiler:Show
Did you manage the integral?
Try Q2 it is trivial honestly like GCSE level.
Spoiler:ShowStarted with integration and was completely fine, subbed into last integral and it boiled to to solving integral of 1/(1+sinx)^2, which I wasn't able to do since I was too stupid to realise that I could just write this as that sec expression squared.
I did try Q2 and it was very easy until the last part which I just failed at.
With Q4 I did everything right but lost half the marks because for some ridiculous reason I had every trig graph correct but flipped in the yaxis.
Q5 I could do all of it except proving that Sn was arctan(n/(n+1)).
Q7 was just a failure, probably like 2 marks.
Q1 simply couldn't do the second part. Probably because I did the first part in a somewhat different way to the ms, but I believe still correctly.
Not even sure if this performance was even a f***ing 2. Strange how I got S in II 2014 and 2013 though. 
 Follow
 432
 05062016 13:14
Q2II 1992 (further discussion about solutions of differential equations)
Determine the solutions of y = x * dy/dx  cosh( dy/dx ) (*)
by differentiating we get that either y '' = 0 (1) OR x = sinh ( y' ) (2)
the solutions of these two SEPARATELY are y =Ax  cosh(A) (3) and y = x * arsinh(x)  sqrt ( x^2+1 ) (4)
and that's where the TSR solution stops ... well there are other solutions to * as well (branched functions)!
(1) or (2) means for some x it might be (1) for other (2) only condition : in the branch point y has to be continuous and dy/dx should be defined.
Thus other functions that satisfy * : y = (3) with A=A1 for x<=sinh(A1) , (4) for sinh(A1)<x<sinh(A2) , (3) with A=A2 for x>=sinh(A2) for all A1<A2
which is graphically straight line  curve  straight line we can also have straight linecurve or vice versa so with only one branch point but we can't have a line in the middle of the curve (easy to notice in geogebra) so these are all the possible combinations.
Don't you think that's right ? Why was it omitted ? Please I really want to get an answer !Last edited by Vesniep; 05062016 at 13:22. 
 Follow
 433
 05062016 13:31
(Original post by Vesniep)
... 
 Follow
 434
 05062016 13:58
(Original post by IrrationalRoot)
Yep when I was doing this Q I also briefly considered the fact that combinations of these solutions could also be solutions. I think the examiner just expected candidates to conclude that there are two separate solutions and ignore that there may be differentiable piecewisedefined functions which combine the two solutions.(Original post by Vesniep)
Q2II 1992 (further discussion about solutions of differential equations)
Determine the solutions of y = x * dy/dx  cosh( dy/dx ) (*)
by differentiating we get that either y '' = 0 (1) OR x = sinh ( y' ) (2)
the solutions of these two SEPARATELY are y =Ax  cosh(A) (3) and y = x * arsinh(x)  sqrt ( x^2+1 ) (4)
and that's where the TSR solution stops ... well there are other solutions to * as well (branched functions)!
(1) or (2) means for some x it might be (1) for other (2) only condition : in the branch point y has to be continuous and dy/dx should be defined.
Thus other functions that satisfy * : y = (3) with A=A1 for x<=sinh(A1) , (4) for sinh(A1)<x<sinh(A2) , (3) with A=A2 for x>=sinh(A2) for all A1<A2
which is graphically straight line  curve  straight line we can also have straight linecurve or vice versa so with only one branch point but we can't have a line in the middle of the curve (easy to notice in geogebra) so these are all the possible combinations.
Don't you think that's right ? Why was it omitted ? Please I really want to get an answer !
(Original post by DFranklin)
Having had a look, subbing in for y=Ax+B you end up finding B = cosh A, so y=AxcoshA is one family of solutions.I haven't looked at how the 2nd (nastier) solution behaves.
As a general comment: If you have a first order DE (no d2y/dx2 terms), then you don't expect more than 1 arbitrary constant. But you may get more than one family of solutions if there are some manytoone functions in there.E.g. (dy/dx)^2 = 1 has two families of solutions y=A+x and y = A  x. 
 Follow
 435
 05062016 14:09
(Original post by Zacken)
I'm pretty sure that sum of solutions to this first order DE are not a solution to the first order DE. 
 Follow
 436
 05062016 14:09
(Original post by Zacken)
I'm pretty sure that sum of solutions to this first order DE are not a solution to the first order DE. 
 Follow
 437
 05062016 14:20
(Original post by Vesniep)
We are not talking about the sum of these two solutions , but a change from one to another (branched functions) which is possible I used geogebra to demonstrate it and it works perfectly fine as well (of course I also proved it analytically)
This means that there are not just two solutions but infinitely many piecewise ones combining the two.Last edited by IrrationalRoot; 05062016 at 14:23. 
 Follow
 438
 05062016 14:23
(Original post by IrrationalRoot)
Yep when I was doing this Q I also briefly considered the fact that combinations of these solutions could also be solutions. I think the examiner just expected candidates to conclude that there are two separate solutions and ignore that there may be differentiable piecewisedefined functions which combine the two solutions.
Another common mistake is in logarithms when the solutions frequently use ln(f(x)) instead of ln(abs(f(x)) in the end signs and everything are fine but you are not sure if you have found all solutions and it works 'magically' rather than rigorously ... that's why I spend so much time on these questions 
 Follow
 439
 05062016 14:28
(Original post by Vesniep)
Yes I think it's not really required to think that many cases when solving DEs in STEPs.
Another common mistake is in logarithms when the solutions frequently use ln(f(x)) instead of ln(abs(f(x)) in the end signs and everything are fine but you are not sure if you have found all solutions and it works 'magically' rather than rigorously ... that's why I spend so much time on these questionsPost rating:1 
 Follow
 440
 05062016 14:47
(Original post by IrrationalRoot)
I agree, a lot of the time I get stuck because of technical points like these which most of the time they don't expect you to consider.
Write a reply…
Reply
Submit reply
Register
Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post Already a member? Sign in
Oops, something wasn't right
please check the following:
Sign in
Not got an account? Sign up now
Updated: August 26, 2016
Share this discussion:
Tweet
TSR Support Team
We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.