You are Here: Home >< Maths

# M1 hard moment question help please;(

Announcements Posted on
Why bother with a post grad? Are they even worth it? Have your say! 26-10-2016
1. hi I am stuck on part b as I don't understand where I have gone wrong. Attachment 544943544945 I have worked out what T would be and equate it with TQ found in part a but it doesn't work. Why is that. Also for part c, it is asking you to prove that x is less than 2 right ? For this I don't get why w can be equal to 0. How do you know when w can be 0 or not ?? Thanks so much . Also how do I answer c I am kind of lost.
Attached Images

2. (Original post by coconut64)
hi I am stuck on part b as I don't understand where I have gone wrong. Attachment 544943544945 I have worked out what T would be and equate it with TQ found in part a but it doesn't work. Why is that. Also for part c, it is asking you to prove that x is less than 2 right ? For this I don't get why w can be equal to 0. How do you know when w can be 0 or not ?? Thanks so much . Also how do I answer c I am kind of lost.
For b) I agree with your answer but you can make it a bit nicer by multiplying top and bottom by 6 and factorising if you like.

For c, w must be greater than 0. Who says that w can be 0?

It would help if you posted the answers that you are looking at since you seem to be basing what you're saying on these answers.
3. (Original post by notnek)
For b) I agree with your answer but you can make it a bit nicer by multiplying top and bottom by 6 and factorising if you like.

For c, w must be greater than 0. Who says that w can be 0?

It would help if you posted the answers that you are looking at since you seem to be basing what you're saying on these answers.
thanks
4. (Original post by coconut64)
thanks
Your answer for b) is the same as theirs. Have you tried simplifying it?

The answer for c) is wrong. It should be .

You can easily check that their answer is wrong by plugging in e.g. .
5. (Original post by notnek)
Your answer for b) is the same as theirs. Have you tried simplifying it?

The answer for c) is wrong. It should be .

You can easily check that their answer is wrong by plugging in e.g. .
When I simpilify my answer it's still the not same though. the two equations give me different answers when I sub 1.2 into x for both equations. This is physics and maths s tutor s solution though, are you sure it's wrong? Thanks.
6. (Original post by coconut64)
When I simpilify my answer it's still the not same though. the two equations give me different answers when I sub 1.2 into x for both equations. This is physics and maths s tutor s solution though, are you sure it's wrong? Thanks.
You should have 30 on the bottom not 300. Check that again - it should be an easy mistake to spot.

You can then multiply top and bottom of your fraction to make it have the same form as the answer.

The solution you posted is from the M1 solutionbank. It often has mistakes.
7. (Original post by notnek)
You should have 30 on the bottom not 300. Check that again - it should be an easy mistake to spot.

You can then multiply top and bottom of your fraction to make it have the same form as the answer.

The solution you posted is from the M1 solutionbank. It often has mistakes.
Hi thanks I got the answer for b now but for part c it's w>0 so x<2? This is my answer .thanks
8. (Original post by coconut64)
Hi thanks I got the answer for b now but for part c it's w>0 so x<2? This is my answer .thanks
That's correct.

The question actually says, "Deduce that x < 2".

So it's clear that there's a mistake in the solution.
9. (Original post by notnek)
That's correct.

The question actually says, "Deduce that x < 2".

So it's clear that there's a mistake in the solution.
Thanks for helping. I was confused when I see the answer. I know that for this kind of question that mg is always bigger than 0 but I don't really understand why they can't be 0 though.
10. (Original post by coconut64)
Thanks for helping. I was confused when I see the answer. I know that for this kind of question that mg is always bigger than 0 but I don't really understand why they can't be 0 though.
You are told that a particle of weight W is attached to the girder.

You can't have a particle with zero mass. Then it's not a particle anymore, it's nothing

## Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
1. this can't be left blank
2. this can't be left blank
3. this can't be left blank

6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

4. this can't be left empty
1. Oops, you need to agree to our Ts&Cs to register

Updated: June 7, 2016
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Today on TSR

### Who is getting a uni offer this half term?

Find out which unis are hot off the mark here

Poll
Useful resources

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read here first

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams