Is modern feminism causing more and more men to be gay?

It is the truth now that many men, not just unattractive ones, are living in a kind of post sex or being needed by women era. Women are more interested in social media and iphones. They are even talking about the end of sex, with babies being conceived when women want by tech advances, it's not beyond the bounds of possibility that with genetic engineering/enhancement, you could even become the minority for conceiving in the basic fashion. The sexual marketplace seems very different that it was for our fathers and grandfathers. Is feminism leading more and more men to see desires for women as futile? Humans are complex and I don't believe homosexuality is the black and white binary innate disposition it's made out to be, folr example, were those homosexual men cultivated by boarding schools all innately more likely to be gay? Clearly environment plays a role. If men start out desiring women, realise that there is nothing doing and trying to have sex is futile, they will eventually sublimate their desires, even in the process is subconscious, they may channel their sexuality a different way as the human mind or biology won't keep motivating itself towards something futile. The research on homosexuality suggests the more older brothers a man has, the greater a chance a man has of being gay. This seems logical....if there are already brother(s) in the right amount to provide the next generation of kin below that, maybe some others are designed for a different evolutionary role in protecting that kin. The boarding school phenomenon would seem to have to do with sexual options, then the power of conditioning. So continuing, it would seem that sexually disinterested/picky women, a feminist climate, the increasingly unattractive prospect of having kids, with the world in a precarious place, economics hard and women in control too much and few reproductive options for men, mean that more and more men are becoming homosexual or open to it.

Your thoughts....?

My thoughts...?

Use paragraphs.

Yes, clearly environment plays a role; but there's the environment, and then there's the subcategory of socialisation.
Environment also includes the environment affecting gene expression, which is also thought to be a cause for homosexuality prenatally.

The elder brother theory is because of an increased likelihood of a different response in the mother's womb; again, gene expression, again epigenetics.

.

It is the truth now that many men, not just unattractive ones, are living in a kind of post sex or being needed by women era. Women are more interested in social media and iphones. They are even talking about the end of sex, with babies being conceived when women want by tech advances, it's not beyond the bounds of possibility that with genetic engineering/enhancement, you could even become the minority for conceiving in the basic fashion. The sexual marketplace seems very different that it was for our fathers and grandfathers. Is feminism leading more and more men to see desires for women as futile? Humans are complex and I don't believe homosexuality is the black and white binary innate disposition it's made out to be, folr example, were those homosexual men cultivated by boarding schools all innately more likely to be gay? Clearly environment plays a role. If men start out desiring women, realise that there is nothing doing and trying to have sex is futile, they will eventually sublimate their desires, even in the process is subconscious, they may channel their sexuality a different way as the human mind or biology won't keep motivating itself towards something futile. The research on homosexuality suggests the more older brothers a man has, the greater a chance a man has of being gay. This seems logical....if there are already brother(s) in the right amount to provide the next generation of kin below that, maybe some others are designed for a different evolutionary role in protecting that kin. The boarding school phenomenon would seem to have to do with sexual options, then the power of conditioning. So continuing, it would seem that sexually disinterested/picky women, a feminist climate, the increasingly unattractive prospect of having kids, with the world in a precarious place, economics hard and women in control too much and few reproductive options for men, mean that more and more men are becoming homosexual or open to it.

Your thoughts....?