Should Donald Trump ban Muslim from coming to the US? He renews Muslim ban

its funny that isis took responsibiliy for the attack u dummy!

Of course not, how's that even a question.

Posted from TSR Mobile

Some Muslim countries do it so why can't America?

No the extremist minority isn't tiny.


Why is it that mostly muslims result to terrorism when they feel marginalised? Why aren't as many cases of radical Christianity, or radical judaism or hinduism? why can't muslims just suppress their anger when the world is against them, why cause terror?

Christians also used to believe in some pretty damn oppressive things. Islam is most prevalent in lesser developed countries. When the West was at that stage of development we too held similar beliefs. Liberal Islam is rapidly growing as globalisation and economic development changes political views.

People are saying Islam is a bad religion. But in reality, not all Muslims are bad. Islam is not the problem. The problem is that some conservative and traditionalist muslims foolishly believe groups like ISIS. True Islam is supposed to be progressive, to encourage thinking. In the Quran, it evens asks to be questioned. In Islam, the worst person is not the evildoer, it is the person who blindly follows the evildoer. Thinking for yourself is important, which unfortunately not many of them do. If you want to stop terrorism, banning muslims won't help. It will just make them hate us even more. The root cause of terrorism is hate and ignorance, and to fight them we need peace and education.

Because America is better than every single muslim country and Americans aren't hateful or intolerant.

Proof of the first claim?

And because Christians, Jews and Hindus aren't nearly as marginalised as Muslims are in the West. In instances where those groups ARE marginalised, they DO become a radical force. Catholicism in communist Poland, 1st Century Zealotism, there are even examples of Buddhist extremism in the last few decades.

Then why allow those who come from hateful or intolerant countries (and allow them to continue as they were back home as is the case here)

But this is the 'muslim' cake and eat it argument

you can't be intolerant towards us (as you are better than that) but we can be intolerant towards you

For them it's a win win.

no - polls in the UK at least show that the newer generation of muslims are actually *more* radical than their parents' generation.



national security being improved, maybe? if you want to have an immigration policy that is in line with your foreign policy, why doesn't it make sense? what defines US (and UK) foreign policy = counter/anti-terrorism. terrorists are always muslims (basically). yes, the minority of muslims are radical in the sense that they believe in political jihadi islam, the majority are at least more sympathetic to those terrorists than other groups of people and believe more so in incompatible values of the west (homophobia, misogyny, huge intolerance towards dissidents of the religion, and anti-semitism) so in general why would you want to import muslims here whom will cultivate those values in their new country? integration is a fantasy. multiculturalism doesn't work - these kinds of groups don't assimilate.

You can't ban people on the basis of their religion. It's unconstitutional.

We are talking about Modern day Christianity, Judaism and Hinduism.

The vast amount of terrorist acts are committed by Muslims due to the fact that a lot of them just can't integrate into western culture.

Right now even the radical christie groups like the westboro baptist church and the KKK don't Go on shooting sprees or kill people as much as islamic terrorists do.

Well with increasing pressures of radical groups and people like you who like to demonise Islam, are you surprised more and more are becoming more sympathetic to the ideology that, to them, appears to support their struggle?

You can't ban people on the basis of their religion. It's unconstitutional.

Except the terrorist was, oh yeah, a U.S.-born citizen.

So you're comparing modern Western religions to non-Western religions thriving mainly in countries that are far, far behind the West developmentally. That comparison is reductionist and invalid.

Again, that's because Christianity is accepted in the West far more than Islam. Extremism is fuelled by wider intolerance, among other things, and Christianity is more tolerated than Islam.