(Original post by Absent Agent)
You seem to be using the word 'proof' in a very narrow, literal sense of the word
Well proof means proof, it does not mean half concocted theories that are then subjectively programmed into students by education to convince them that these half concocted theories are proof. When in reality most of the theories are so far away from being proof , they might as well be sitting in heaven, something else there is no proof of.
You are subjected to the subjective, I was lucky enough to quit school before the end because I simply could not see the point.
If you are truly objective you would see this very evidently point I am making, you only say Photons exist because you were learnt they exist, but ask yourself this question without even thinking about it, do you see photons between your eyes and these very dark , absence of light words, or do actually see a quanta whole and ''gin-clear''?
The darkness of these words is not transmitting light into your eyes so you can see these words, you are seeing the silhouette that is not an illuminated surface. These words are in their exact geometrical position, they are not inside your head and just a picture.
Science is wrong , I am right, causality is the infinite speed of sight.
I do not understand any of it! can somebody please explain?
|Four hours left to win £100 of Amazon vouchers!! Don't miss out! Take our short survey to enter||24-10-2016|