Best A level subjects?

i hate the pressure to do subjects that universities find impressive, imo, ALL A level subjects require a lot of work and dedication, who's to say that a Drama A level for example is worth less than a Maths or Physics A level? Having just done my A2's, i think that doing any A level at all should prove that you're worthy of a uni place...and to refuse places on the grounds that certain subjects are "soft subjects" (ie drama, photography etc) just isnt fair. So, I'd advise choosing subjects that you'll enjoy because you're going to be studying them fairly intensively for the next two years, don't pick something you don't like, it isn't worth it!

What are the best subjects to take at Alevel?? Best implying most impressive on a university application and most employable.

x

i hate the pressure to do subjects that universities find impressive, imo, ALL A level subjects require a lot of work and dedication, who's to say that a Drama A level for example is worth less than a Maths or Physics A level? Having just done my A2's, i think that doing any A level at all should prove that you're worthy of a uni place...and to refuse places on the grounds that certain subjects are "soft subjects" (ie drama, photography etc) just isnt fair. So, I'd advise choosing subjects that you'll enjoy because you're going to be studying them fairly intensively for the next two years, don't pick something you don't like, it isn't worth it!

I've never heard of a Photography A-Level... Perhaps that's why universities think it's "soft". Because people know nothing about it, therefore it sounds obscure which people tend to associate with doss subjects. I would say if you meet the basic requirement for the course you wanna enter into, then you shouldn't be discriminated against based on your other subjects. But if you think about it - EVERYONE who apply for that course WILL have the basic requirements all met anyway, so how on earth are they to distinguish who is better academically besides from the PS? Their other subjects and their other grades. Now, would you normally respect an A in Maths, which you know is hard to get, more, or would you respect an A in Art, more? Of course Maths takes preference.

^Don't get me wrong, I did Art A-Level and I can tell you it's one of the hardest and most stressful A-Levels I know - and people think it's a doss!

I've never heard of a Photography A-Level... Perhaps that's why universities think it's "soft". Because people know nothing about it, therefore it sounds obscure which people tend to associate with doss subjects. I would say if you meet the basic requirement for the course you wanna enter into, then you shouldn't be discriminated against based on your other subjects. But if you think about it - EVERYONE who apply for that course WILL have the basic requirements all met anyway, so how on earth are they to distinguish who is better academically besides from the PS? Their other subjects and their other grades. Now, would you normally respect an A in Maths, which you know is hard to get, more, or would you respect an A in Art, more? Of course Maths takes preference.

^Don't get me wrong, I did Art A-Level and I can tell you it's one of the hardest and most stressful A-Levels I know - and people think it's a doss!

Is there much value in taking a language for A level??

Perhaps the reason why art and other less academic A-Levels are generally rated below the traditional ones is because of the scope they provide for courses? A maths A-Level is very useful for numerous courses and shows key skills (that you're numerate, analytical etc.), which art is only useful for art or a closely related subject.

that's what drives me mad, an Art A level is SO much work, friends of mine who took it were always working on various art projects etc, and with photography, i probably spent about 60% of my homework time just doing that. And, yes ok, anyone can go and take a photo, or pick up a paintbrush, but you need to have a certain amount of talent to be able to do the course, just like with anything else.

Maybe it's because all the complex formulae look very impressive and hard to understand....

People who choose it tend to be less inclined towards academic work (even if they're prepared to work more hours on their art).

That seems to be true for GCSE level but I have seen the exact opposite at A Level. The majority of people I know that did well at Art A Level were also very academic too.
I know you said "tend to" but it just made me realise that I have encountered the exact opposite.

As someone else on this thread stated; it is a talent - and a talent i certainly don't possess - but so is being good at rugby or being able to spit really, really far. You can argue about which is most important in life, but if you think that art is better than the academic subjects then why are you arguing for Art to more respected in Academia? "Because it's hard" is not an argument - difficulty and respectability and not always linked.
It astounds me the number of people who therefore take these "unrespected" subjects and moan about how much work it is. I see people doing badly at my school taking subjects like P.E. and they say how hard they are - i think to myself; why didn't he take the "respected" subjects then if they're easier... oh wait, he did. He was also taking Physics. Now ok, his D in P.E. was bad for the amount of work he put in, but his U in Physics i think is really impressive.

Well okay - rant over. This wasn't directed entirely at A SoapBubble, sorry if it looked like that. I'm prepared to be attacked by a group of Artists and Photographers