You are Here: Home >< Maths

# fp1 complex numbers

Announcements Posted on
Would YOU be put off a uni with a high crime rate? First 50 to have their say get a £5 Amazon voucher! 27-10-2016
1. (Original post by NeverLucky)
I think what you're saying is correct. However, for part b, is perpendicular to . So if has a positive gradient, then has a negative, reciprocal gradient.

i.e.
i understand but in this video the guy doesn't put the 2 points on the same part of the graph(close together) he puts one on the first quadrant and the other which has (x,-y) which is on the "bottom" part of the parabola.
see
http://www.examsolutions.net/a-level...6&solution=8.2

i guess though i could still try and carry on.
2. (Original post by bigmeat)
i understand but in this video the guy doesn't put the 2 points on the same part of the graph(close together) he puts one on the first quadrant and the other which has (x,-y) which is on the "bottom" part of the parabola.
see
http://www.examsolutions.net/a-level...6&solution=8.2

i guess though i could still try and carry on.
It honestly doesn't really matter where he puts the points - the points on the graph are arbitrary. It really is just for the viewer to get an idea of the method on how to do the question. He could have just as easily put the points next to each other but of course that's not going to be neat.
3. (Original post by NeverLucky)
It honestly doesn't really matter where he puts the points - the points on the graph are arbitrary. It really is just for the viewer to get an idea of the method on how to do the question. He could have just as easily put the points next to each other but of course that's not going to be a neat.
oh right, i though i did it wrong from the first step thanks ^-^
4. (Original post by Chittesh14)
It's all part (b)s today lol. Another one....
Posted from TSR Mobile
Working out in case you want to see it
Spoiler:
Show

Posted from TSR Mobile
5. (Original post by RDKGames)
Working out in case you want to see it
Spoiler:
Show

Posted from TSR Mobile
I'm just playing games for like 4 hours lol. I'm going to do Maths later, but thank you for posting this. I'll take a look if I need it - most probably will.
6. (Original post by RDKGames)
Working out in case you want to see it
Spoiler:
Show

Posted from TSR Mobile
what's the difference between cartesian and parametric?
7. (Original post by flyingd)
what's the difference between cartesian and parametric?
Cartesian is only in terms of x and y.
Parametric form is mostly in terms of coordinates that you have to rearrange and substitute in order to find the Cartesian form.
8. (Original post by Chittesh14)
Cartesian is only in terms of x and y.
Parametric form is mostly in terms of coordinates that you have to rearrange and substitute in order to find the Cartesian form.
ok thanks
9. (Original post by flyingd)
what's the difference between cartesian and parametric?
Cartesian are your normal everyday equations involving x and y; where both are dependent on each other. Parametric equations introduce a third variable, usually t, where both x and y are dependent on it; as you manipulate t, both x and y change accordingly. This third variable usually has a range that you can set, but it's not necessary. You can change between the two forms by means of substitution.

Example:

can be represented in the parametric form of:

where t is real. Try some out on Desmos and you can see how parametrics are much more useful than cartesian coordinates in some cases.

Parametrics open up doors to some cool looking graphs such this one that I've created when I first learnt about parametrics: https://www.desmos.com/calculator/jekx6csxzm
10. (Original post by flyingd)
http://www.examsolutions.net/maths-r.../example-1.php

^^ is there another way to do this? i don't know how to do implicit differentiation but i do know how to use the chain rule
Just normally do it. Like xy = c^2...
y = c^2/x
y = c^2x^-1
dy/dx = -c^2/x^2

and then sub in the x value (a) find gradient use y-y1 = m(x-x1) at that point etc... done easy!
11. (Original post by flyingd)
http://www.examsolutions.net/maths-r.../example-1.php

^^ is there another way to do this? i don't know how to do implicit differentiation but i do know how to use the chain rule
What Chittesh said is the most straight forward way. You can also use parametrics which is strightly more long winded but can be useful if that y was y2.

Posted from TSR Mobile
12. (Original post by Chittesh14)
Just normally do it. Like xy = c^2...
y = c^2/x
y = c^2x^-1
dy/dx = -c^2/x^2

and then sub in the x value (a) find gradient use y-y1 = m(x-x1) at that point etc... done easy!
(Original post by RDKGames)
What Chittesh said is the most straight forward way. You can also use parametrics which is strightly more long winded but can be useful if that y was y2.

Posted from TSR Mobile
thanks both
13. (Original post by flyingd)
thanks both
Anytime.

Posted from TSR Mobile
14. What Chittesh said is the most straight forward way.
No it isn't, implicit differentiation is more straight forward, and always the method I'd recommend for these type of questions, re-arranging and then differentiating is just bad form.
15. (Original post by Zacken)
No it isn't, implicit differentiation is more straight forward, and always the method I'd recommend for these type of questions, re-arranging and then differentiating is just bad form.
Some people don't understand implicit differentiation that well? I think it depends more on the person...

Posted from TSR Mobile
16. (Original post by Zacken)
No it isn't, implicit differentiation is more straight forward, and always the method I'd recommend for these type of questions, re-arranging and then differentiating is just bad form.
guess i should learn it then? would i find this in c3 or c4?
17. (Original post by flyingd)
guess i should learn it then? would i find this in c3 or c4?
You'll find it in C4; it's quite straightforward once you learn it really.
18. (Original post by Zacken)
No it isn't, implicit differentiation is more straight forward, and always the method I'd recommend for these type of questions, re-arranging and then differentiating is just bad form.
I meant that in the context where implicit differentiation was out of the question. Obviously that would be the go-to option for everyone but he clearly stated how to do the question without it.
19. (Original post by NeverLucky)
You'll find it in C4; it's quite straightforward once you learn it really.
ok thanks i'll have a look
20. (Original post by flyingd)
ok thanks i'll have a look
If you're going into Year 12, I'd say stick with what I done, I prefer it much more. I haven't learnt implicit differentiation myself but that's because I just don't want to lol.

Posted from TSR Mobile

## Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
1. this can't be left blank
2. this can't be left blank
3. this can't be left blank

6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

4. this can't be left empty
1. Oops, you need to agree to our Ts&Cs to register

Updated: July 28, 2016
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Today on TSR

### University open days

Is it worth going? Find out here

Poll
Useful resources

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read here first

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams