You are Here: Home >< Physics

# Fluid Mechanics Help

Announcements Posted on
TSR's new app is coming! Sign up here to try it first >> 17-10-2016
1. I would like to describe the Torricelli's law at the level of A level Physics (i.e. with no prior knowledge to Bernoulli's equation and having no knowledge of pressure energy).

The law states that the speed of efflux, v, of a fluid through a sharp-edged hole at the bottom of a tank filled to a depth h is the same as the speed that a body (in this case a drop of water) would acquire in falling freely from a height h, i.e., where g is the acceleration due to gravity.

Is there an alternative way to derive/explain this result other than using conventional Bernoulli's equation?

2. Can you not derive it directly from the conservation of energy? For every unit volume of water leaving the tank, the water level in the tank drops. Thus the tank has lost some gravitational potential energy, and produced some kinetic energy, and the tank might be thought of as a device that converts energy in this way.

Equating the energy input with the energy output should give you the desired relation.

This is not entirely surprising because Bernoulli's equation is based on energy conservation.
3. (Original post by mik1a)
Can you not derive it directly from the conservation of energy? For every unit volume of water leaving the tank, the water level in the tank drops. Thus the tank has lost some gravitational potential energy, and produced some kinetic energy, and the tank might be thought of as a device that converts energy in this way.

Equating the energy input with the energy output should give you the desired relation.

This is not entirely surprising because Bernoulli's equation is based on energy conservation.
Thank you so much. Following your argument, I could come up with the following tedious proof.

lawlieto Here is another proof to the relation.

Posted from TSR Mobile
Attached Images

4. (Original post by tangotangopapa2)
Thank you so much. Following your argument, I could come up with the following tedious proof.

lawlieto Here is another proof to the relation.

Posted from TSR Mobile
Thank you it actually makes sense now
5. Nice work.

## Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
1. this can't be left blank
2. this can't be left blank
3. this can't be left blank

6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

4. this can't be left empty
1. Oops, you need to agree to our Ts&Cs to register

Updated: July 28, 2016
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Today on TSR

### How does exam reform affect you?

From GCSE to A level, it's all changing

### Who would you like to thank?

Poll
Study resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.