You are Here: Home >< Maths

# Sequences

Announcements Posted on
Last day to win £100 of Amazon vouchers - don't miss out! Take our quick survey to enter 24-10-2016
1. A sequence is defined by the iterative formula where and .
Find the values of and such that if then the sequence is strictly increasing.
Find the limit of the sequence as prove that for all .

This seems to be quite and awkward question and not too easy to go about it.
2. (Original post by Ano123)
A sequence is defined by the iterative formula where and .
Find the values of and such that if then the sequence is strictly increasing.
Find the limit of the sequence as prove that for all .

This seems to be quite and awkward question and not too easy to go about it.
What have you tried?
3. (Original post by RDKGames)
What have you tried?
Just replace all the terms with L and solve for L. But this doesn't prove that L exists. The proof is the most difficult bit. Any pointers?
4. (Original post by Ano123)
Just replace all the terms with L and solve for L. But this doesn't prove that L exists. The proof is the most difficult bit. Any pointers?
An increasing sequence bounded above must converge.
5. (Original post by Ano123)
Just replace all the terms with L and solve for L. But this doesn't prove that L exists. The proof is the most difficult bit. Any pointers?
Not sure. I'm finding contradictions with that one. Since the limit is 6, it is usually approached from above it rather than below it regardless of whether is or . I'm not too great at these so I could be wrong.
6. (Original post by Ano123)
A sequence is defined by the iterative formula where and .
Find the values of and such that if then the sequence is strictly increasing.
Find the limit of the sequence as prove that for all .

This seems to be quite and awkward question and not too easy to go about it.
Drawing graphs of y=11-30/x and y=x may help - have you come across cobwebbing?
7. (Original post by RDKGames)
Not sure. I'm finding contradictions with that one. Since the limit is 6, it is usually approached from above it rather than below it regardless of whether is or . I'm not too great at these so I could be wrong.
The sequence is constant for both 5 and 6
Spoiler:
Show
I haven't actually written anything down or worked it through properly but I suspect they are p and q, and you're supposed to take a0 as between them for that final limit part, in which case it would be strictly increasing but never exceed 6, else you could just make a0 10^10^10^10^G64 and the only sensible L would be 11, which is clearly not the case
8. (Original post by 16Characters....)
An increasing sequence bounded above must converge.
How do you prove that the sequence converges? I have shown that if the sequence is increasing. How would I prove that ?
9. (Original post by ValerieKR)
The sequence is constant for both 5 and 6
Spoiler:
Show
I haven't actually written anything down or worked it through properly but I suspect they are p and q, and you're supposed to take a0 as between them for that final limit part, in which case it would be strictly increasing but never exceed 6
Yeah you're right, I was thinking about it wrong.
10. (Original post by RDKGames)
Yeah you're right, I was thinking about it wrong.
The question isn't as clear as it could be
11. (Original post by Ano123)
How do you prove that the sequence converges? I have shown that if the sequence is increasing. How would I prove that ?
You don't have to prove that necessarily. Your upper bound does not have to be your limit, it could be anything so long as is always less than or equal to it.
12. (Original post by Ano123)
How do you prove that the sequence converges? I have shown that if the sequence is increasing. How would I prove that ?
As above, with what 16Characters said, but also: induction.
13. (Original post by Zacken)
As above, with what 16Characters said, but also: induction.
I tried to use induction but the argument seemed quite weak.
I said that if

.
We know that so .

Is this really a sufficient proof?
14. (Original post by Ano123)
I tried to use induction but the argument seemed quite weak.
15. (Original post by Ano123)
I tried to use induction but the argument seemed quite weak.
Really? Pops out in a line for me: .
16. (Original post by ValerieKR)
(Original post by Zacken)
Really? Pops out in a line for me: .
Is what I put above ok?
17. (Original post by Ano123)
Is what I put above ok?
Yes
18. (Original post by Ano123)
Is what I put above ok?
Yes, that's what I did. Why d'you think it's not okay?

## Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
1. this can't be left blank
2. this can't be left blank
3. this can't be left blank

6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

4. this can't be left empty
1. Oops, you need to agree to our Ts&Cs to register

Updated: September 7, 2016
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Today on TSR

### How does exam reform affect you?

From GCSE to A level, it's all changing

Poll
Useful resources

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read here first

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams