You are Here: Home >< Maths

# CSAT sample paper question

Announcements Posted on
Why bother with a post grad? Are they even worth it? Have your say! 26-10-2016
1. find all integers a, b and c that satisfy
I've factorised it so that is on the left side. Where do I go from here? (assuming that I'm right)
Sorry for the poor latex, first time

What level is this question? C1?
Attached Images

2. (Original post by Daiblain)
find all integers a, b and c that satisfy
I've factorised it so that is on the left side. Where do I go from here? (assuming that I'm right)
Sorry for the poor latex, first time

What level is this question? C1?
You're over complicating it.
3. (Original post by Daiblain)
find all integers a, b and c that satisfy
I've factorised it so that is on the left side. Where do I go from here? (assuming that I'm right)
Sorry for the poor latex, first time

What level is this question? C1?
Think about it. What do you expect the solution to be? With non-routine problems it's important to think about the problem for a bit before rushing into blind algebraic manipulations.
4. Since it's asking for 'all' the integers, would the answer be an inequality? I have no clue
5. (Original post by Daiblain)
Since it's asking for 'all' the integers, would the answer be an inequality? I have no clue
No, the only way you can add an integer multiple of the square root of two to an integer and expect to get an integer multiple of the square root of 3 is if a,b,c=0
6. (Original post by Zacken)
No, the only way you can add an integer multiple of the square root of two to an integer and expect to get an integer multiple of the square root of 3 is if a,b,c=0
So there are no solutions other than 0 for all of them? And the only reason you can't add them together is because both sides are irrational?
7. (Original post by Daiblain)
So there are no solutions other than 0 for all of them? And the only reason you can't add them together is because both sides are irrational?
Yep. And no, it's because of a more technical reason: namely them being linearly independent.
8. (Original post by Zacken)
Yep. And no, it's because of a more technical reason: namely them being linearly independent.
Thanks alot!

## Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
1. this can't be left blank
2. this can't be left blank
3. this can't be left blank

6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

4. this can't be left empty
1. Oops, you need to agree to our Ts&Cs to register

Updated: September 17, 2016
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Today on TSR

### University open days

Is it worth going? Find out here

Poll
Useful resources

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read here first

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

## Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups
Study resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.