The Student Room Group

Black lives matter vs all lives matter social experiment




Black lives matter, that only focuses on black lives is considered progressive, anti-racist

All lives matter, which includes all people is racist

Scroll to see replies

No, it is not simply the statement it is what they stand for. BLM does not state WL dont matter -they are fighting more for equality than power.
Such pranks and social experiments are staged, I don't believe either
Original post by Eternalflames
Such pranks and social experiments are staged, I don't believe either


Joey Salads is notorious for staged pranks/social experiments, just watch H3H3 and see how/why.
"Social Experiment"= justification for acting like a complete cokwomble.


That is the issue with "All Lives Matter"; nobody said that they don't, but people are against the way that the statement is made for the purpose of shutting down debate.
Original post by WBZ144


That is the issue with "All Lives Matter"; nobody said that they don't, but people are against the way that the statement is made for the purpose of shutting down debate.


Actually, Bob isn't the only one not getting food. There are other people at the table with empty plates, too. But no-one is talking about them, and they're tired of Bob pretending as though he's the only guy going hungry. In fact, a lot of people suspect he has more food than he's letting on, and that he often exaggerates how little food he has.
Reply 7
Lol joey salads.

Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 8
Black victimization is a myth. Lots of racial groups in America have had it much harder than the blacks and have not been around as long - but have never needed handouts or affirmative action. Getting rid of whitey just makes the problem worse - Zimbabwe is a case in point.
(edited 7 years ago)
Reply 9
Black lives matter to black lives matter that is why they decided to end a 26 year old black mans life.
Original post by Dandaman1
Actually, Bob isn't the only one not getting food. There are other people at the table with empty plates, too. But no-one is talking about them, and they're tired of Bob pretending as though he's the only guy going hungry. In fact, a lot of people suspect he has more food than he's letting on, and that he often exaggerates how little food he has.


And if you believe that you can counter Bob's points with your own arguments, as opposed to making meaningless statements in attempts to shut down further discussion.
Original post by el0hssa
Black victimization is a myth. Lots of racial groups in America have had it much harder than the blacks and have not been around as long - but have never needed handouts or affirmative action. Getting rid of whitey just makes the problem worse - Zimbabwe is a case in point.


Who is calling to "get rid of whitey"? Aren't your suggestions that people are calling for that merely "White victimisation"?

Which racial groups? I can think of Native Americans for one, but they were around long before both Blacks and Whites.

And an you give examples of these "handouts and affirmative action"?
And then we have Black lives Matter UK, who believe things like this...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-shuuGCQXUc
Reply 13
Original post by WBZ144
Who is calling to "get rid of whitey"? Aren't your suggestions that people are calling for that merely "White victimisation"?

Which racial groups? I can think of Native Americans for one, but they were around long before both Blacks and Whites.

And an you give examples of these "handouts and affirmative action"?


In USA they have affirmative action - if you're black you will get into college with equal grades to a white person - even if the white person is really poor. Plus you'd probably on a paid black-only scholarship. As for groups who have done better then blacks: Chinese, Koreans, Indians, Arabs; heck even the descendants of Vietnamese boat people do ok for themselves.
Original post by el0hssa
In USA they have affirmative action - if you're black you will get into college with equal grades to a white person - even if the white person is really poor. Plus you'd probably on a paid black-only scholarship. As for groups who have done better then blacks: Chinese, Koreans, Indians, Arabs; heck even the descendants of Vietnamese boat people do ok for themselves.


Source? Also, I was asking for groups that have "have had it much harder than the blacks", in your words.
Reply 15
Original post by WBZ144
Source? Also, I was asking for groups that have "have had it much harder than the blacks", in your words.


Chinese, Indians, Arab immigrants. Vietnamese boat people. It's much harder being piss poor and coming to a new country then being born there.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_action_in_the_United_States
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Negro_College_Fund

Also if you look around there are lots of technology schemes at the moment that are only for women and non Chinese/white minorities.
Original post by Dandaman1
Actually, Bob isn't the only one not getting food. There are other people at the table with empty plates, too. But no-one is talking about them, and they're tired of Bob pretending as though he's the only guy going hungry. In fact, a lot of people suspect he has more food than he's letting on, and that he often exaggerates how little food he has.


#rekt

That's gotta hurt.
Minorties using violence is common as their is no punishment for them..i've never seen these minority groups complain about racism and back up their own claims, they dont have a bone of respect or understanding for the majority culture except calling you racist - telling us to live a multicultural life and sell out our culture for their benefits whilst they stick to their own.
(edited 7 years ago)
Original post by Dandaman1
Actually, Bob isn't the only one not getting food. There are other people at the table with empty plates, too. But no-one is talking about them, and they're tired of Bob pretending as though he's the only guy going hungry. In fact, a lot of people suspect he has more food than he's letting on, and that he often exaggerates how little food he has.


That isnt Bobs fault though is it?

If there are plenty of people round the table who dont have enough food surely it would be better to blame the people with too muchnfood who wont share or the waiter that never brought enough food in the fkrst place?
I don't watch anything with social experiment in the title.

Quick Reply