How does n/2(4n2) simplify to give n(2n1)?
i thought that to cancel out the n/2, you multiply it by 2, which would give n(8n4)?
Am I just derping? is it as simple as n(8n4), which is then simplified to n(2n1)? Is that possible?
Thanks!
How does n/2(4n2) simplify to give n(2n1)?
Announcements  Posted on  

Last day to win £100 of Amazon vouchers  don't miss out! Take our quick survey to enter  24102016 

 Follow
 1
 3 weeks ago 3w ago

 Follow
 2
 3 weeks ago 3w ago
(Original post by blobbybill)
How does n/2(4n2) simplify to give n(2n1)?
i thought that to cancel out the n/2, you multiply it by 2, which would give n(8n4)?
Am I just derping? is it as simple as n(8n4), which is then simplified to n(2n1)? Is that possible?
Thanks!
Factorise a factor of 2 in (4n2), (4n2) =2(2n1)Last edited by NotNotBatman; 3 weeks ago at 18:08. 
 Follow
 3
 3 weeks ago 3w ago
Ah no, you can't multiply it because it's not a normal equation! You can think about it this way:
n/2(4n2) = (n(4n2))/2 = n x (4n2)/2 = n x (4n/2  2/2) = n x (2n1) = n(2n1)
Hope this made it clearer 
 Follow
 4
 3 weeks ago 3w ago

 Follow
 5
 3 weeks ago 3w ago
(Original post by blobbybill)
I don't understand what you mean. 
 Follow
 6
 3 weeks ago 3w ago
you could look at it as
n* 1/2 *(4n2)
multiply 1/2 by (4n2) and you get 2n1 
 Follow
 7
 3 weeks ago 3w ago
n/2(4n2) = n((4n2)/2) = n(2n1)

 Follow
 8
 3 weeks ago 3w ago
(Original post by StationToStation)
Ah no, you can't multiply it because it's not a normal equation! You can think about it this way:
n/2(4n2) = (n(4n2))/2 = n x (4n2)/2 = n x (4n/2  2/2) = n x (2n1) = n(2n1)
Hope this made it clearer
Are there any other simpler methods?
For example, can you just divide the bracket contents of (4n2) by 2, so that both sides are divided by two? That works in this instance, would it work in every instance though? 
 Follow
 9
 3 weeks ago 3w ago
(Original post by NiamhM1801)
n/2(4n2) = n((4n2)/2) = n(2n1)
For example, can you just divide the bracket contents of (4n2) by 2, so that both sides are divided by two and then the divided by two would cancel out? That works in this instance, would it work in every instance though? Is that a valid method too, or is it just that it happens to work in this instance? 
 Follow
 10
 3 weeks ago 3w ago
(Original post by blobbybill)
Thanks. I understand it now, but that seems like a very long winded method.
Are there any other simpler methods?
For example, can you just divide the bracket contents of (4n2) by 2, so that both sides are divided by two? That works in this instance, would it work in every instance though? 
 Follow
 11
 3 weeks ago 3w ago
(Original post by blobbybill)
Thanks! In addition to this method, are there any other even simpler ways?#
For example, can you just divide the bracket contents of (4n2) by 2, so that both sides are divided by two and then the divided by two would cancel out? That works in this instance, would it work in every instance though? Is that a valid method too, or is it just that it happens to work in this instance? 
 Follow
 12
 3 weeks ago 3w ago
this is an expression not an equation so you can’t multiplyout anything the only thing you can do to an expression is simply if by taking outfactors so just look at the bracket and ask yourself what common factors canyou take out and its a 2 so the 2s cancel and give you the expression you wantof n(2n1) j

 Follow
 13
 3 weeks ago 3w ago
(Original post by Daz0101)
this is an expression not an equation so you can’t multiplyout anything the only thing you can do to an expression is simply if by taking outfactors so just look at the bracket and ask yourself what common factors canyou take out and its a 2 so the 2s cancel and give you the expression you wantof n(2n1) j 
 Follow
 14
 3 weeks ago 3w ago
(Original post by blobbybill)
When you say the twos cancel out, do you mean get rid of the 2 from n/2, and then also divide the bracket by 2 (from 4n2 to give 2n1) ?Last edited by Daz0101; 3 weeks ago at 21:51. 
 Follow
 15
 3 weeks ago 3w ago
(Original post by Daz0101)
yes, that’s it you have it just remember in expressions you can’t divide or multiply terms out you can cancel and simplify that’s it so dont say divide by2 say take a factor of 2 out if you think like that when you see expressionsyou automatically know what to do if you confuse the two by the way you’rethinking about it you will make silly mistakes I used to do that so never say dividefor an expression then you never get the 2 confused hope that helps
If you take out a factor of two, you divide everything by two don't you (because you take a ? if not, how does it work? Whats the difference by taking out a factor of two and dividing by two? 
 Follow
 16
 3 weeks ago 3w ago
(Original post by Daz0101)
yes, that’s it you have it just remember in expressions you can’t divide or multiply terms out you can cancel and simplify that’s it so dont say divide by2 say take a factor of 2 out if you think like that when you see expressionsyou automatically know what to do if you confuse the two by the way you’rethinking about it you will make silly mistakes I used to do that so never say dividefor an expression then you never get the 2 confused hope that helps
With this expression i just described ^^, taking out a factor of x would result in 4 4, whereas if you divided by x, it would go to 4  4/x? Am I right in thinking this? Is this what you mean? 
 Follow
 17
 3 weeks ago 3w ago
(Original post by blobbybill)
OHH, do you mean that by taking out a factor of something, eg, x in the equation 4x 4, you mean that you only take out x where there is an x available, so you don't divide by x?
With this expression i just described ^^, taking out a factor of x would result in 4 4, whereas if you divided by x, it would go to 4  4/x? Am I right in thinking this? Is this what you mean?Last edited by Daz0101; 3 weeks ago at 17:19. 
 Follow
 18
 3 weeks ago 3w ago
(Original post by blobbybill)
i dont get it, I dont understand the difference between dividing and multiplying, and removing/adding factors of a number?
If you take out a factor of two, you divide everything by two don't you (because you take a ? if not, how does it work? Whats the difference by taking out a factor of two and dividing by two?
you would just leave it as is as there are no common factores so the exprestion would not simplify
Write a reply…
Reply
Submit reply
Register
Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post Already a member? Sign in
Oops, something wasn't right
please check the following:
Sign in
Not got an account? Sign up now
Updated: October 3, 2016
Share this discussion:
Tweet
TSR Support Team
We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.