You are Here: Home >< Maths

# Right, this is annoying me

Announcements Posted on
TSR's new app is coming! Sign up here to try it first >> 17-10-2016
1. Apologies it's not in latex. Working out stationary points of:

z=4xy - x^4 - y^4

dz/dx = 4y-4x^3 = 0

dz/dy = 4x-4y^3 = 0

I solve dz/dx and get x = y^1/3. I substitute this into dz/dy and get y = 0, y = 1. I'm missing a result.The stationary points should be (0,0), (-1,-1), ), (1,1)Where does the (-1,-1) come from?!

I'm being really stupid..
2. (Original post by hezzlington)
Apologies it's not in latex. Working out stationary points of:

z=4xy - x^4 - y^4

dz/dx = 4y-4x^3 = 0

dz/dy = 4x-4y^3 = 0

I solve dz/dx and get x = y^1/3. I substitute this into dz/dy and get y = 0, y = 1. I'm missing a result.The stationary points should be (0,0), (-1,-1), ), (1,1)Where does the (-1,-1) come from?!

I'm being really stupid..
Initially I assumed you would have accidentally lost a solution by having incorrectly divided through by a variable somewhere in your simplification, but doing so would ommit the (0,0) solution and not the (-1,-1) solution so I'm not quite sure what you've done?

In any case from dz/dx = 4y-4x^3 = 0 we get x=y^1/3 or x^3=y which then when subbed into dz/dy = 0 gives x=x^9 (or y=y^9).

y=y^9 is satisfied by y=0,-1,1 which correspondingly gives solutions (x,y) = (0,0), (-1,-1) and (1,1) so I'm not sure about your issue?

A mistake might have been to write y=y^9 => 1=y^8 => y=+-1 which loses the (0,0) solution because you have artificially lowered the order of the equation but since you are missing (-1,-1) I'm not sure whats gone wrong without seeing your workings...

Hope this helps.

Edit: Unless you've just made the elementary oversight of forgetting -1^(2n-1) = -1 for all positive integers n.
3. (Original post by In One Ear)
A mistake might have been to write y=y^9 => 1=y^8 => y=+-1 which loses the (0,0) solution because you have artificially lowered the order of the equation but since you are missing (-1,-1) I'm not sure whats gone wrong without seeing your workings...
I'm pretty sure the OP got to the point and then simply failed to realise (-1,-1) was a solution; looks fairly clear they were just spotting roots by inspection and it seems fairly easy to fail to recognize that y being -ve is an option here even though we're taking the cube root.

(Original post by hezzlington)
..
Without wanting to "nag", I'll point out that even if you didn't find (-1, -1) yourself, you really should have been able to verify that (-1, -1) was a solution to your equation. Since verification is usually easier than finding solutions, it's a good habit to get into, both with your own solutions (to make sure you've not made a silly mistake), and also solutions provided to you. (For a provided solution, you are not so much checking the solution is correct, but that your equations do actually "work" for the solution).

## Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
1. this can't be left blank
2. this can't be left blank
3. this can't be left blank

6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

4. this can't be left empty
1. Oops, you need to agree to our Ts&Cs to register

Updated: October 6, 2016
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Today on TSR

### How does exam reform affect you?

From GCSE to A level, it's all changing

Poll
Useful resources

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read here first

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams