You are Here: Home >< Maths

# Mechanics toppling question

Announcements Posted on
TSR's new app is coming! Sign up here to try it first >> 17-10-2016
1. Hey guys

Could you please help me with this toppling question?I have looked at the answer and understand it, but for the second part, why is it not possible to assume that the normal reaction force at vertex P is 550N?

If the object was stationary and in equilibrium, then wouldn't normal reaction equal the weight force (550N) and thus stay that way when toppling? I know this is incorrect but I don't understand why. Can the reaction force change?

2. (Original post by dyuunn)
Hey guys

If the object was stationary and in equilibrium, then wouldn't normal reaction equal the weight force (550N) and thus stay that way when toppling? I know this is incorrect but I don't understand why. Can the reaction force change?
If a body is in equilibrium then net force on it should be zero (translational equilibrium). If normal force were 550N then, the total upwards force would be 550N (normal force) and the vertical component of T (which is obviously non-zero) and downward force would be 550N hence there would be a net upward force, making the object accelerate upwards which is not true.
3. (Original post by tangotangopapa2)
If a body is in equilibrium then net force on it should be zero (translational equilibrium). If normal force were 550N then, the total upwards force would be 550N (normal force) and the vertical component of T (which is obviously non-zero) and downward force would be 550N hence there would be a net upward force, making the object accelerate upwards which is not true.
Thank you for your answer - so in these sorts of cases, we would not assume anything about the reaction force?
4. (Original post by dyuunn)
Thank you for your answer - so in these sorts of cases, we would not assume anything about the reaction force?
The reaction force is always equal to the total downward force, here mg(weight) - T sin 60 degrees (upward component of tension). In the microscopic level, object crushes the surface a bit, and the normal force is the force applied by the surface to prevent it from being crushed further (analogous to the restoring force in the spring).

We would assume reaction force to be equal to the total downward force (perpendicular and into the surface to be more general) but in opposite direction.
5. Oh that makes a ton of sense - thank you for your time!!

## Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
1. this can't be left blank
2. this can't be left blank
3. this can't be left blank

6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

4. this can't be left empty
1. Oops, you need to agree to our Ts&Cs to register

Updated: October 6, 2016
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Today on TSR

### How does exam reform affect you?

From GCSE to A level, it's all changing

Poll
Useful resources

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read here first

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams