Results are out! Find what you need...fast. Get quick advice or join the chat
Hey! Sign in to get help with your study questionsNew here? Join for free to post

Calculating magnification

Announcements Posted on
Applying to Uni? Let Universities come to you. Click here to get your perfect place 20-10-2014
    • Thread Starter
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    hi evry1,
    im having trouble with calculating magnification, basically using the eqn:
    magnification=observed/actual

    its the part where you have to jump between units where im having trouble.
    For example the diameter of this cell from A to B is 40micrometers. Calc the magnification of this drawing.

    The distance from A to B i measured to be 5.6cm. The answer is 1500 but i have no idea how this was done.

    please help,

    thanks
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    How would you start the qu?
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    er well mag = image/ actual object

    image is 5.6cm = 56mm = 56 000 micrometres = 56 000 000 nanometers

    56 000 000 /40 = 1 400 000

    have i done something really stupid/ wrong here?
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    I would have converted both to metres, so got
    (5.6 x 10^-2)/(40 x 10^-9) = 1,400,000.
    Are you sure the diameter is in nanometres, and not micrometres?
    • Thread Starter
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    sorry my mistake, its in micrometers.
    but i still cant get the right answer .

    do you think we might have to round up the length to 6cm as that would give the right answer.
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    ye that would be right
    • Thread Starter
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    so the question now is that if for example the observed length of a cell is like 3.6 cm, would i round it up to 4 or use 3.6 as the figure.
    also in the markscheme it doesnt say anything about allowing any other answers.

    thanks
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    I would use the accurate value you measured. Normally in exams they would expect you to measure it accurately and use that measurement in your calculations.
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    use the one that you measured exactly. in the mark schemes i read for working out the magnification, there's always a range of values that it could be- unless the thing you're measuring is clearly to the nearest mm.

    maybe you measured the image inaccurately? they sometimes ask you to measure the diameter of an organelle at its widest point or something...
    • Thread Starter
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    No, it was definatley 5.6cm from A to B as it said in the question and there was a dotted line joining the two points.
    is there anything wrong with the method i used?

    thanks
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    nope there wasnt anything wrong with your method. except the bit where you mistakenly took micrometers for nanometers lol.

    so maybe the mark scheme is wrong then; they are constantly updated when the are used to mark the papers as they can sometimes have mistakes. i wouldnt worry about it, what you did is right.
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    I have a possible solution as to where you could have gone wrong. If you are working off a small printed A5 test booklet then the answer in the mark scheme will not agree as that refers to the A4 version
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Magnification = observed size/ actual size

    you have to convert the values into the correct values so that you get the right answer.

    5.6cm = 56mm
    40 micrometers= 0.04 mm 1mm= 1000 micrommeters
    so the maginification is 56/0.04= 1400
    1micrometer= 1000 nm
    • 15 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by minikitkat)
    Magnification = observed size/ actual size

    you have to convert the values into the correct values so that you get the right answer.

    5.6cm = 56mm
    40 micrometers= 0.04 mm 1mm= 1000 micrommeters
    so the maginification is 56/0.04= 1400
    1micrometer= 1000 nm
    This thread is nearly two years old!

Reply

Submit reply

Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
  1. this can't be left blank
    that username has been taken, please choose another Forgotten your password?
  2. this can't be left blank
    this email is already registered. Forgotten your password?
  3. this can't be left blank

    6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

  4. this can't be left empty
    your full birthday is required
  1. By joining you agree to our Ts and Cs, privacy policy and site rules

  2. Slide to join now Processing…

Updated: December 23, 2009
New on TSR

Personal statement help

Use our clever tool to create a PS you're proud of.

Article updates
Reputation gems:
You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.