"Exactly The Sourbon is over a thousand years old so for sheer numbers of famous Alumni it ****s all over the US universities. The table is a mockery of a sham of a sham of a mockery. Even going by that table if you reunited the 13 universities it would be top anyway, so this is hardly particularly revolational. It just depends how you want to manipulate the statistics to favour yourself.
And famous prime ministers so has the Sorbonne? 3 Noble prize winners in this century alone, and more great theologians, philosophers and scientists than you can shake a stick at. I fart in your general direction, your mother was warthog and your father smelt of elderberries. You silly English kanigget!"
An alumni list is not a basis from which to argue contemporary superiority. even so, in terms of noble prize winners, theologians, philosophers and scientists, oxford and cambridge far outweigh the sorbonne, and looking over the past century, US universities also defeat Sorbonne and are comparable to Oxford and Cambridge. Where Prime ministers are concerned, the Sorbonne counts no foreign leaders I can think of at all (it is almost inevitable that a nation;s political leaders will have attended its best university), whereas the other universities I mention count many (even if this is because of their english speaking status) however, as i said, an impressive alumni list does not give nany indication of current standards