STEP Maths I, II, III 1988 solutions
Maths exam discussion - share revision tips in preparation for GCSE, A Level and other maths exams and discuss how they went afterwards.
-
STEP Maths I, II, III 1988 solutions
(Updated as far as #68) SimonM - 15.06.2009
Seeing as people seem to have asked for a thread for this for quite a while I thought I might as well make one.
I guess you're all familiar what these threads are for by now; post your solutions to the older STEP papers as there are no solutions available freely on the net - plus it's good revision
Feel free to post alternative solutions, and please point out when you see a weakness or mistake in a solution.
If you look in the STEP megathread you will find a link to the papers - if you still have problems accessing them, PM me or someone else who has them.
STEP I:
1: Solution by nota bene
2: Solution by nota bene
3: Solution by Glutamic Acid
4: Solution by brianeverit
5: Solution by Swayum
6: Solution by brianeverit
7: Solution by Glutamic Acid
8: Solution by brianeverit
9: Solution by nota bene
10: Solution by brianeverit
11: Solution by brianeverit
12: Solution by brianeverit
13: Solution by brianeverit
14: Solution by brianeverit
15: Solution by nota bene
16: Solution by brianeverit
STEP II:
1: Solution by kabbers
2: Solution by SimonM
3: Solution by Glutamic Acid
4: Solution by brianeverit
5: Solution by Squeezebox
6: Solution by SimonM
7: Solution by Square
8: Solution by brianeverit
9: Solution by SimonM
10: Solution by brianeverit
11: Solution by brianeverit
12: Solution by brianeverit
13: Solution by brianeverit
14: Solution by brianeverit
15: Solution by brianeverit
16: Solution by brianeverit
STEP III
1: Solution by kabbers
2: Solution by Squeezebox
3: Solution by mikelbird and brianeverit
4: Solution by mikelbird
5: Solution by kabbers
6: Solution by kabbers
7: Solution by squeezebox
8: Solution by SimonM
9: Solution by SimonM
10: Solution by ben-smith
11: Solution by Jkn
12. Solution by ben-smith
13: Solution by ben-smith
14: Solution by ben-smith
15:
16: Solution by ben-smith
Solutions written by TSR members:
1987 - 1988 - 1989 - 1990 - 1991 - 1992 - 1993 - 1994 - 1995 - 1996 - 1997 - 1998 - 1999 - 2000 - 2001 - 2002 - 2003 - 2004 - 2005 - 2006 - 2007Last edited by SimonM; 4 Days Ago at 19:28. -
Re: STEP Maths I, II, III 1988 solutions
STEP I Q1

For max/min set h'(x)=0 i.e.
To find the nature of the stationary point, consider e.g. h'(e-0.2)=positive and h'(e+0.2)=negative hence a (global) maximum. For sketching purposes might be worth noting that
and
. Graph see attached (Mathematica because of lack of scanner
).
Solving
is equivalent of solving
(last step valid as neither m nor n can be 0).
m=n is the trivial solution.
Consider the line f=c (i.e. a constant). For
there are two solutions. There's one solution when
or
. And for
there are no solutions.
Now if
then
(
).



Thus
and
.
(What am I missing here, this looks trivial for a STEP question...)
----
STEP I Q2
(
)


Let

Now WLOG
Has solutions cos(x)=0 and sin(x)=1/2
i.e.
where 
By quadratic formula the solutions are
i.e. u=-1, 2
has no real solutions and
has the root
(which we have already found).
where 
Solutions to this are
and as
sin(x)=u will have no real solutions.
,
so a (local)min 
,
so a (global) min 
,
so a (global) max 
,
so a (local) max
Last edited by nota bene; 13-04-2008 at 10:42. -
Re: STEP Maths I, II, III 1988 solutionsLaTeX. It's installed on the forum software - see the thread in the maths forum called "PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING !!" for an explanation of how to use it.(Original post by The Lyceum)
High, quick question: What programme are you using to write out the Mathematics? I've seen such quite alot here but have no idea to do so myself. :|
Thanks.
-
Re: STEP Maths I, II, III 1988 solutions
Good idea Nota
. I'll have a look at the paper(s) tomorrow and see if I get anything out.
Also....1989 has many unsolved questions. [/shameless plug]
generalebriety - could you link this in the Big fat STEP mega thread, pretty please
?
Last edited by squeezebox; 13-04-2008 at 00:53. -
Re: STEP Maths I, II, III 1988 solutionsAh, yes. *feels stupid*(Original post by DFranklin)
Nota: I think you would be expected to give at least some justification why (2,4) and (4,2) are the only 'non-trivial' solutions. (Without giving you a hard time for the slipup: if you missed (2,4), how do you know you didn't miss anything else?)
Consider the line f=c (i.e. a constant). For
there are two solutions. There's one solution when
or
. And for
there are no solutions.
Now if
then
(
).



Thus
and
.
-
Re: STEP Maths I, II, III 1988 solutions
III/1:
Sketch
I'm not going to bother posting most of the differentiating legwork, there arent too many tricks, its just an algebra bash.
Differentiating (quotient rule is your friend), we get

So we have turning points at x = 0, and x =
Differentiating again, we get

Substituting in values of x for the turning points, we find that x = 0 is a minimum, and the other two maximums.
Noticing the denominator of y, we find that there is an asymptote at x = -1.
And because of the exponential properties of e^-x, y tends to zero as
y tends to
as
since the numerator remains positive and given the exponenential properties of e^x much greater than the denominator, while the denominator becomes negative.
So the graph will look http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/show...8&postcount=14
Prove
First note that
Hence we may split the integral into
Consider

![= \displaystyle([-xe^{-x}]^{\infty}_0 + \int^{\infty}_0 e^{-x} dx - \int^{\infty}_0 e^{-x} dx = \displaystyle([-xe^{-x}]^{\infty}_0 + \int^{\infty}_0 e^{-x} dx - \int^{\infty}_0 e^{-x} dx](http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/latexrender/pictures/5b/5b4fca20e6e71f65d75afb00c3cd8e47.png)

Now consider
I posit the inequality
for x > 0



So our inequality holds.
So:

![\displaystyle\int^{\infty}_0 \frac{1}{x+1}e^{-x} dx < [-e^{-x}]^{\infty}_0 \displaystyle\int^{\infty}_0 \frac{1}{x+1}e^{-x} dx < [-e^{-x}]^{\infty}_0](http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/latexrender/pictures/62/62fd68c7ca3893487576ad6eb32a0e42.png)

Thus
And therefore,
Now notice that the graph of
is greater than 0 for x > 0, and hence so is the infinite integral.
So,
please point out any mistakes
Last edited by kabbers; 13-04-2008 at 15:21.
Feel free to post alternative solutions, and please point out when you see a weakness or mistake in a solution.
