Results are out! Find what you need...fast. Get quick advice or join the chat
Hey! Sign in to get help with your study questionsNew here? Join for free to post

Official TSR Mathematical Society

Announcements Posted on
Applying to Uni? Let Universities come to you. Click here to get your perfect place 20-10-2014
    • 3 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TheMagicMan)
    Spoiler:
    Show
    This is correct. Anything beneath 2 can be reached, but 2 itself cannot.
    Boom! Part ii will be attempted tomorrow...
    • 3 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Slumpy)
    After a little bit of work, I'm guessing at
    Spoiler:
    Show
    i-2
    Anything up to 2 can be won(1/3,0,1/3,1/3, then goes to 0,0,1/3,0 goes to 2/3,0,2/3,0 then repeatedly split the 1 you add between the two places so they're equal). Once above x-1, add 1 to the number left. I'm not sure if you can reach 2 however, pretty sure you could make some argument about any number above 1 should be sent to 0 by B, and you can't get more than 1 there at once. Close?
    I have a simple proof that the value must be 2 or below, only a couple of line for ii.
    • 3 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Blutooth)
    I have a simple proof that the value must be 2 or below, only a couple of line for ii.
    Post it up? I get the feeling you can argue in a similar way to what I did before, but it's not hugely elegant.
    • 5 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TheMagicMan)
    ..
    Have to finish couple of things these days, so I'm half missing.

    Looking at that, considering the optimality of B and the number of quantities, I reckon it is fairly easy to build a geometric progression?
    You can easily build a symmetry so that B doesn't have a choice, and then every consecutive turn A does not have a choice.

    So, if you start with 1/2, next you have 1/4... hence, general term S_n = 1 - 2^{-n} and the limit of that is 1.
    Therefore, taking into account the final turn, all values below 2 can be obtained.

    For part two, I'm getting some strange series. Would you reckon you get a lower value for x than 2?

    If so, I can try to find something about the third part, but I have to finish few pages of a coursework before that tonight. And to EAT - always forget that.
    • 4 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by gff)
    Have to finish couple of things these days, so I'm half missing.

    Looking at that, considering the optimality of B and the number of quantities, I reckon it is fairly easy to build a geometric progression?
    You can easily build a symmetry so that B doesn't have a choice, and then every consecutive turn A does not have a choice.

    So, if you start with 1/2, next you have 1/4... hence, general term S_n = 1 - 2^{-n} and the limit of that is 1.
    Therefore, taking into account the final turn, all values below 2 can be obtained.

    For part two, I'm getting some strange series. Would you reckon you get a lower value for x than 2?

    If so, I can try to find something about the third part, but I have to finish few pages of a coursework before that tonight. And to EAT - always forget that.
    On the 5 quantity one the maximum value is at least what it is on the 4 quantity one as you can play the same strategy ignoring one quantity if you want
    • 3 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TheMagicMan)
    On the 5 quantity one the maximum value is at least what it is on the 4 quantity one as you can play the same strategy ignoring one quantity if you want
    Part ii) is proving rather tricky to prove. Though I can show for part 2 that the x must be less than 2.25. Still can't home in on the 2.


    for an even number n, i think the highest value you can get for x is 1+ 1/2 +1/3 +1/4+....+1/(n/2) +1/2
    or if the number is odd 1+1/2+1/3+...+1/((n-1)/2) +1/2

    Can't prove this is the highest though, though looking at the method I can sort of see why this number should be the highest, ie at each step you are focusing on filling fewerpots and at the same time minimising the amount of water thrown out by the thrower until you have one pot remaining.
    • 15 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Hello, what is meant differentiate with respect to x, does that mean calculate when dy/dx = 0?


    (Original post by raheem94)
    ...
    • 5 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by King-Panther)
    Hello, what is meant differentiate with respect to x, does that mean calculate when dy/dx = 0?
    If your y is given by y = f(x), then it simply asks you to find \displaystyle \frac{dy}{dx}. You would equate \displaystyle\frac{dy}{dx} to zero in order to find stationary points -- i.e. local minima or maxima.
    • 46 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by King-Panther)
    Hello, what is meant differentiate with respect to x, does that mean calculate when dy/dx = 0?
     \displaystyle y = x^2 + 3x

    If you are said to differentiate the above equation with respect to 'x', then you need to find dy/dx.

     \displaystyle \frac{dy}{dx} = 2x+3

    You still look to be confused about that turning points concept.

    When you are asked to find the turning points, then you need to first find the dy/dx (i.e. differentiate the 'y' expression with respect to 'x') and then make dy/dx equal to zero.
    • 15 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by raheem94)
     \displaystyle y = x^2 + 3x

    If you are said to differentiate the above equation with respect to 'x', then you need to find dy/dx.

     \displaystyle \frac{dy}{dx} = 2x+3

    You still look to be confused about that turning points concept.

    When you are asked to find the turning points, then you need to first find the dy/dx (i.e. differentiate the 'y' expression with respect to 'x') and then make dy/dx equal to zero.
    (Original post by gff)
    ..
    O.k, so I differentiate to find x?

    The equation is y=x^1/2(8+x)
    • 46 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by King-Panther)
    O.k, so I differentiate to find x?
    Can you tell me which question are you talking about?
    • 15 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by raheem94)
    Can you tell me which question are you talking about?
    The equation is y=x^1/2(8+x)
    • 46 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by King-Panther)
    The equation is y=x^1/2(8+x)
    This is the equation, what does the question asks you to find? What is the complete question?
    • 15 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by raheem94)
    This is the equation, what does the question asks you to find? What is the complete question?
    differentiate with respect to x

    i got, dy/dx=(4x^-1/2)+(3/2x^1/2)
    • 46 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by King-Panther)
    differentiate with respect to x

    i got, dy/dx=(4x^-1/2)+(3/2x^1/2)
    Yes, you did it correctly and got the correct answer .
    • 15 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by raheem94)
    Yes, you did it correctly and got the correct answer .
    What would I sub in to get 0? Or do I not have to do that??
    • 15 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by raheem94)
    Yes, you did it correctly and got the correct answer .
    Thats the piece of work I'm doing, for future reference.
    Attached Files
  1. File Type: doc C2_-_50_Questions.doc (111.0 KB, 51 views)
    • 46 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by King-Panther)
    What would I sub in to get 0? Or do I not have to do that??
    I have seen the microsoft word file. You question is done, you don't need to do anything further.
    • 15 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by raheem94)
    I have seen the microsoft word file. You question is done, you don't need to do anything further.
    The next question, I got dy/dx = 12x + 5

    So when gradient is 13, I did

    13 = 12x + 5

    which is x = 2/3



    I dont understand Q)15.
    • 46 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by King-Panther)
    The next question, I got dy/dx = 12x + 5

    So when gradient is 13, I did

    13 = 12x + 5

    which is x = 2/3
    You are starting to grasp the concepts .

    This is correct as well, i also get the same answer.

Reply

Submit reply

Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
  1. this can't be left blank
    that username has been taken, please choose another Forgotten your password?
  2. this can't be left blank
    this email is already registered. Forgotten your password?
  3. this can't be left blank

    6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

  4. this can't be left empty
    your full birthday is required
  1. By joining you agree to our Ts and Cs, privacy policy and site rules

  2. Slide to join now Processing…

Updated: September 26, 2014
New on TSR

A-level results day

Is it about making your parents proud?

Article updates
Reputation gems:
You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.