yes, i left my answer as 1 mole CuSO4:1.5 moles H2O...but it's like an equation where you double the values to get a whole number, thats how i tried to explain it, like an empirical formula calculation.
As i said, rounding down by nearly half a mole is, in my opinion, just stupid...but if that's the answer, gutted. 29/30 max for me.
and i, and most in my session at school for 132.2 for the Mr.
no 2CuSO4.3H2O is wrong, it asked for how many moles of h20 present with one mole of copper sulphate, it was correct to round down which is what i did.
Went well, I got most of it right from what I can remember, except the planning section - I used random figures of CuSO4 and Zn powder; 100cm^3 and 10g respectively.
In short, yes basically you would - as long as you described that on the fourth minute the temperature difference (deltaT) was between the extended extrapolation and line of best fit before the zinc was added.
If you did this and described as you just did I don't see any reason why the examiners should dock you marks, as I have done this also on a mock exam and got full marks.
It's always best to do examples though, so bare that in mind.