Results are out! Find what you need...fast. Get quick advice or join the chat
Hey there Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free

The mischeif rule v the purposive approach

Announcements Posted on
    • Thread Starter
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Hey,

    Can someone run through the different between these two rules please? I know the mischief rule is where the court looks at the law prior to the introduction of the Act in order to establish what gap in the law/mischief the Act was intended to remedy, and that the purposive approach is described as going beyond this by seeking to established what Parliament intended to achieve by the introduction of the Act - but what does this mean in real terms? Anyone got any case law examples?

    My problem can be demonstrated by Smith v Hughes. The court looked at the law before the introduction of the Street Offences Act and found that the aim behind the act was to 'enable people to walk down the streets without being molested or solicited at by common prostitutes' - surely this would demonstrate the purposive approach as well?

    I don't quite understand the difference that's my problem really.

    Thanks
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by matthew.)
    Hey,

    Can someone run through the different between these two rules please? I know the mischief rule is where the court looks at the law prior to the introduction of the Act in order to establish what gap in the law/mischief the Act was intended to remedy, and that the purposive approach is described as going beyond this by seeking to established what Parliament intended to achieve by the introduction of the Act - but what does this mean in real terms? Anyone got any case law examples?

    My problem can be demonstrated by Smith v Hughes. The court looked at the law before the introduction of the Street Offences Act and found that the aim behind the act was to 'enable people to walk down the streets without being molested or solicited at by common prostitutes' - surely this would demonstrate the purposive approach as well?

    I don't quite understand the difference that's my problem really.

    Thanks
    I don't know if you need to know the purposeive approach really as the other three will proabaly be suffiecient. I have never seen a Q where they ask you specifically about one approach
    • Thread Starter
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Yeah I had that in the back on my mind but I'm being safe rather than sorry (and doing it speedily given the time! )

    I have found some notes I wrote on it a while ago which simply say it allows the courts to adopt an interpretation well beyond (and even over-ruleing) what is said in the Act.

    I think it also links in with the use of the aids, as I have noted that courts are prepated to go to much length to look at additional material in order to find the true purpose of the legislation.

    Case Fitzpatrik v Stirling Housing Association.

    I think that'll do tbh, I would not consider the mischief and purposive approaches together if the question asked to name 1/2/3 rules anyway.

    p.s. What topics have you learnt? I have done/doing Statutory Interpretation, Delegated Legislation and although it doesn't always come up, Influences Upon Parliament as it's fairly easy imo.

    Also, where to presumptions and rules of language come in Staturoty Interpretation? They're not really aids are they....
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    No there just a guide to help judges the aids come in the form of extrinsic and intrinsic aid. i.e. looking at hansard
    • Thread Starter
    • 0 followers
    Offline

    ReputationRep:
    Thanks Alessandro_22

Reply

Submit reply

Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
  1. this can't be left blank
    that username has been taken, please choose another Forgotten your password?
  2. this can't be left blank
    this email is already registered. Forgotten your password?
  3. this can't be left blank

    6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

  4. this can't be left empty
    your full birthday is required
  1. By joining you agree to our Ts and Cs, privacy policy and site rules

  2. Slide to join now Processing…

Updated: May 22, 2008
New on TSR

Find out what year 11 is like

Going into year 11? Students who did it last year share what to expect.

Article updates
Reputation gems:
You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.