That's encouraging...I got the exact same multi choice answers as you did BillyLiu
I think all in all it was a pretty fair paper. I had to laugh at myself in the exam though cause i was sitting for ages trying to work out how to do 26b)i where you had to prove the LDR voltage was 7.5 then i realised that it was a simple, standard grade potential divider question. I still can't believe how stupid i was, although it's as well i got it in the end otherwise that would have been rather embarassing!!
I thought the paper was reallllllyyyyy challenging but fair i suppose. That LED one i just guessed yellow and hoped for a mark because i couldnt justify it! Hopefully i'll get a good mark
I thought the paper was reallllllyyyyy challenging but fair i suppose. That LED one i just guessed yellow and hoped for a mark because i couldnt justify it! Hopefully i'll get a good mark
I hate to be the bearer of bad news but I don't think you'll get any marks if you don't justify it. In physics, terms, it's like an AND gate, you need an answer and a justification to get one or two marks, even if the justification is wrong.
Sorry if anyone disagrees but i thought it was the easiest paper i have seen for a long time in higher physics.
I actually do agree. In comparison to the 2007 paper for a start, it was hellishly easy. I thought the "If this variable is changed, will X be bigger or smaller" questions were pretty decent this time.
I got the same as you Billy Liu minus one - I put E instead of A for 15. Looking at it again, I'm wrong.
We'd been over the LED question only once before in class. I think I got the general gist of it, hopefully. And 24, with the two batteries stumped me. What did people get for that?