The Student Room Group

Zimbabwe

Spain wishes to bring the attention of the UN back to the issue of Zimbabwe's presidential election.

The ruling party, Zanu-PF is influencing the campaign of the opposition, MDC, and Spain believes that the violence and threats will only rise as the run-off election vote approaches.

Spain believes international pressure must be applied to give the people of Zimbabwe a fair and democratic way of choosing their future.

Spain would also like to express its disgust at the presence of President Mugabe at the FAO Summit in Rome.
It has comes to Iraq attention that the opposition leader, Morgan Tsvangirai, has been detained for reasons yet to be known.

We call on to Zimbabwe to release the opposition leader and allow the people in Zimbabwe to free and fair election.
Reply 2
Mr. Tsvangirai seems to have committed no crime but standing for a fair Zimbabwe. We call on Robert Mugabe to release him and let the elections for forward in a free, fair and democratic manner.
Reply 3
Spain would like to express anger at Zimbabwe's decision to block food aid to millions of its people.
The situation in Zimbabwe cannot be allowed to turn into a humanitarian crisis, and Spain wants harsher action to be taken against President Mugabe and his regime.
Reply 4
Russia is horrified by mr Mugabe's tactics to try and maintain his power, despite his position now being untenable.
Reply 5
The Republic of South Africa acknowledges its unique engagement in the ongoing Zimbabwe issue. As ever, South Africa is working without tire in the region to attempt to achieve democratic progress.

Furthermore, The Republic of South Africa wishes, in the light of this debate, bring to the attention of the General Assembly the arrest of three suspected South African nationals in Zimbabwe.

The Department of Foreign Affairs of The Republic of South Africa has taken note of these arrests, aparently on charges of immigration violations. The South African Embassy in Harare is in urgent engagement with the Zimbabwean Authorities in this matter. Consular assistance shall be rendered according to standing procedures. The Republic of South Africa feels the International Community should be aware of this latest development in relations.
Reply 6
Perhaps it is time to use Resolution 2007/44.
Reply 7
ukebert
Perhaps it is time to use Resolution 2007/44.


If such solutions are put to play, it better be before the new election takes place. Peacekeeping shall be done when there's a peace to maintain - will there be one during the new vote? Is there even one at the moment?
As we would be able to agree on the answer, feel free to comment, it might be in our interests not only to protect democracy in Zimbabwe, but also potential investment and profit for our companies and the ones of Zimbabwe.
UAE is keen to discuss this further in line with Lichtenstein.
Reply 8
ukebert
Perhaps it is time to use Resolution 2007/44.



Committee: Peacekeeping & Disarmament
Submitted by: The Principality of Liechtenstein

Noting that peacekeeping missions are often hindered by a lack of knowledge of the area in question, and a lack of understanding between it and the local people,
Further Noting that in some areas there is no force stationed for use in national emergencies (such as fires, floods, aid etc.,
Reminding the UN that in this time missions involving the use of force are needed at an increased frequency,
Convinced that a UN program would at least in part solve these programs, by countering the forces felt at this time to global security,
Confident that a pre-established force could cut the costs involved in a peacekeeping mission, and could ultimately save lives at risk from forces running contrary to the UN.

1. Proposes the creation of the United Nations Peacekeepers Programme (UNPP), for use by the UN in cases of Chapters VI and VII action;

2. Affirms that this program shall be answerable to the Security Council and the Secretary General;

3. Further Proposes that:
1) That in each country where it is deemed preferable by the representative of that country acting under the wishes of the country's government, or by the GA, SC and SG when this country is itself violating Chapters VI or VII, that a permanent force of a size appropriate to the region, split into sub forces if necessary, be deployed. Note that this does nothave to be restricted to those countries that are violating the UN charter, nor those who have no form of protection;
2) That those stationed in a particular country be capable of understanding and integrating with the local people, ideally being of the area themselves where at all possible;
3) That those stationed permanently be comprised of volunteers,
4) That when not instructed by the UN to partake in a military operation the force residing in a country deploy itself at the service of the leaders of that country to do peacetime work, except when that action would be beyond their mandate or involve violent action, at which point they would submit a report to the UN and await developments;
5) That in addition to the forces described above, a centralised UN peacekeeping force be created, which will support the individual forces where necessary at the discretion of the SC and SG, to be no larger than brigade size and be constructed purely of volunteers and based at a rotating number of designated neutral sites;
6) That all peacekeepers obey the code of conduct already in place, and that an oath of neutrality be sworn to the UN;
7) That the existing Military Staff Committee should be responsible for the regulating and reviewing the programme, and that every 6 months theer will be a full review of each position in addition to up to 3 spot checks every year. Regular reports will also have to be sent back to the MSC, in order that the performence of the units can be regulated;
8) That all members be individually chosen on merit by the UN, through a detailed recruitment scheme to best determine whether they are suited for the post;
9) That all units operate under the standard of the United Nations;


4. Requests that the UN provide a budget for the funding of this programme, relative to the size and importance in eache area, and calls upon member states to cooperate with the units stationed therein,

5. Reaffirms the UN’s duty to safeguard peace to all peoples across the globe.


Was this resolution passed by the SC?

If so China believes that if there need be a military option it should be made up primarily of local forces. However China does not believe that during this election is the correct time to conduct a military response. China believes this could further inflame the situation and turn the country into full civil war.
Reply 9
Spain acknowledges more needs to be done to ensure Zimbabwe holds a free and fair election, but it does not believe military action is the answer. This could further endanger the lives of Zimbabwe citizens, and would be counter-productive.

Spain calls on Zimbabwe's neighbouring African nations to pressurise the ruling regime to stop the violence and allow neutral monitors into the country to oversee the upcoming election.
Reply 10
Mike_P
If such solutions are put to play, it better be before the new election takes place. Peacekeeping shall be done when there's a peace to maintain - will there be one during the new vote? Is there even one at the moment?
As we would be able to agree on the answer, feel free to comment, it might be in our interests not only to protect democracy in Zimbabwe, but also potential investment and profit for our companies and the ones of Zimbabwe.
UAE is keen to discuss this further in line with Lichtenstein.


My idea is to authorise a peacekeeping mission with a priority to distribute aid which I gather the charming Mr Mugabe has seen fit to deny his subjects.

Liechtenstein believes that in situations like this the best thing may be to take direct action, given that if the situation is allowed to continue there is a real danger of widespread hunger and violence propogating throughout the region.

The resolution mentioned above was forced through the SC by the cunning and intelligence of it's author, by scheduling the vote between US reps.

And Liechtenstein has 3 e's in it :wink: It took me ages to be able to spell it.
Reply 11
ukebert
My idea is to authorise a peacekeeping mission with a priority to distribute aid which I gather the charming Mr Mugabe has seen fit to deny his subjects.

Liechtenstein believes that in situations like this the best thing may be to take direct action, given that if the situation is allowed to continue there is a real danger of widespread hunger and violence propogating throughout the region.

The resolution mentioned above was forced through the SC by the cunning and intelligence of it's author, by scheduling the vote between US reps.

And Liechtenstein has 3 e's in it :wink: It took me ages to be able to spell it.


At this current time China does not believe that a military force in any manner should be deployed. China will therefore refer to point 2 of the resolution and at this stage veto any action in the SC.
Reply 12
zav
At this current time China does not believe that a military force in any manner should be deployed. China will therefore refer to point 2 of the resolution and at this stage veto any action in the SC.


Why am I not surprised? :p:

ooc

Reply 13
ukebert
Why am I not surprised? :p:

ooc



China suggests that Liechtenstein is not surprised because it is the correct action to take :wink:

OOC

Delegates to turn their attention to the relevant resolution on the issue to hand.

Latest

Trending

Trending