crap
i was hoping people weren't going to say teachers were so important.
have you seen the "understanding standards" website?
type it into google, pleeeassse, i need advice.
i only discovered it today, after i got back from work and ended up worrying about a question from my history int2 exam (still haven't gotten over these exams...quite annoying...my own fault but still, my summer holidays should be fun, how long does it take to mark a few exams? it's ridiculous)
anyway, how much help do you think the site will be?
what is it that needs a teacher? source skills? essays?
also, in my history, on a how useful, i said the following (this is VERY condensed):
-useful as it's primary, written at time of anschluss, so well informed on reactions to anschluss, most probably.
-useful as it was written by a politician. a large aspect of a politician's job is dependent on public reactions to current affairs, increasing likelihood they will be well informed on anscluss.
- shows a widespread reaction in " some people say that czechoslovakia will be hitler's next target but that is not our problem"- chamberlain, the PM's view is shown here- the view that it is all very far away from britain, so none of our business. so clearly a widespread reaction, increasing source's use. also shows churchill's view in " some people say that czechoslovakia will be hitler's next target "- the view held by Churchill, that we should be concerned by Hitler's actions.
-however, source's use is diminished by the fact that it is clearly biased towards the view of chamberlain as it says "that is not our problem" when presenting his view, but it says "some people say", suggesting detachment, when presenting churchill's.
what would i be likely to get?: i'm not sure about the last point.