I found this on the UCL website:
"The following factors are taken into account in deciding which applicants to invite for interview:
Predicted or actual grades. Although there is no simple relationship between academic performance and whether or not a student will make a ‘good’ doctor, there is some evidence that those with low grades or those who need to re-sit modules and examinations are more likely to have academic problems with the programme. The GCSEs will be used as a general indicator of the candidate’s academic background. "
Re-sit modules??? Individual ones? That's really harsh, what if you got an A an re-sat just to get a higher A? I thought loads of people re-sit even if they got good marks just to push them up a bit?
Have I just completely got the wrong idea?