The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

I think you mean you're meant to prove that 26612^{66} - 1 isn't prime?

Let x = 2^33. Show that your number has at least one factor which isn't 1 or 2^66 - 1 itself, and you've shown it's not prime.
Reply 2
lol, 2^66 is even, for god's sake!
Reply 3
alexmahone
lol, 2^66 is even, for god's sake!

And that proves? :s-smilie:
Reply 4
nota bene
And that proves? :s-smilie:


that it isn't prime.
Reply 5
alexmahone
that it isn't prime.


But 2 is even. >.>
Reply 6
BJack
But 2 is even. :s-smilie:


But 2^66 isn't 2! :cool:
Reply 7
An even number (apart from 2) will always be divisible by 2 (and 1 and itself) and thus not prime, but your argument seemed to be that an even number can't be prime...
Reply 8
andrewk
how do you prove that number is not Prime?

the example in my book says prove that 2 to the power of 66 is not prime and then says the keys lies in this simple algebra x squared-1=(x-1)(x+1) it says to use that to write a proof that the number is not prime so what am supposed to do with that equation?


what is the definition of a prime? no factors except itself and 1. Just show it has factors other than itself and 1 that can be shown by factorizing it as the difference of two squares.
Reply 9
But 66 is even so 2^66 is even. But I don't think that's the proof they want
Reply 10
Actually, you can use Fermat's little theorem to show that
266=1(mod 67)2^{66}=1 (mod\ 67)
So, 26612^{66}-1 is divisible by 67
just show it has any factor besides 2^66 and 1 e.g. 2,4, etc
EDIT:Oh so the question actually means show that 2^66 -1 isn't prime.

(2^33-1)(2^33+1) = 2^66 -1 implies 2^66 -1 isn't prime
Reply 12
generalebriety
I think you mean you're meant to prove that 26612^{66} - 1 isn't prime?

Let x = 2^33. Show that your number has at least one factor which isn't 1 or 2^66 - 1 itself, and you've shown it's not prime.


Thanks ye it was supposed to be 26612^{66}-1

ok so i change x to 2332^{33} and type it into my calculator and it gives me the answer 7.37869762910197.378697629*10^{19} so how do i use this to prove it isn't a prime number?

Also as pointed out the original number is even so how would this work for an odd number? e.g. 2672^{67}
Stupidity alert. Do not read further.

2661=(233+1)(2331)2^{66} - 1 = (2^{33} + 1) (2^{33} - 1) by the difference of 2 squares.

2332^{33} is even as it is a multiple of 2.

so 233+12^{33} + 1 is odd as is 23312^{33} - 1.

Two odd numbers multiplied together produce an odd number.

Hence 26612^{66} - 1 must be odd.

Which tells you absolutely nothing about anything cos we can see that from the question.
Reply 14
Mr M
I suspect the OP still doesn't understand!

Here's an accessible argument.

2661=(233+1)(2331)2^{66} - 1 = (2^{33} + 1) (2^{33} - 1) by the difference of 2 squares.

2332^{33} is even as it is a multiple of 2.

so 233+12^{33} + 1 is odd as is 23312^{33} - 1.

Two odd numbers multiplied together produce an even number.

Hence 26612^{66} - 1 must be even.

As it even (and not two!) it is not prime.

Bet he gets it now!


someone's not awake today... :p:
Reply 15
Mr M
I suspect the OP still doesn't understand!

Here's an accessible argument.

2661=(233+1)(2331)2^{66} - 1 = (2^{33} + 1) (2^{33} - 1) by the difference of 2 squares.

2332^{33} is even as it is a multiple of 2.

so 233+12^{33} + 1 is odd as is 23312^{33} - 1.

Two odd numbers multiplied together produce an even number.
Hence 26612^{66} - 1 must be even.

As it even (and not two!) it is not prime.

Bet he gets it now!


Mind giving an example? :biggrin:
Reply 16
... no, the product of two odd numbers is another odd number.

The point of being able to do a difference of two squares factorisation is being able to find non-trivial factors of 26612^{66} - 1. 233+1>2331>12^{33} + 1 > 2^{33} - 1 > 1, hence, we have found the required non-trivial factors of 26612^{66} - 1, therefore it is not prime.
Oh I get it!

Duh.

Just factorising it is enough!

Bet the OP STILL doesn't understand though if he was trying to type numbers into his calc.
Reply 18
the reason your calculator wont help is because you wont be able to see if numbers that large are integers or not.
you have found that the number can be factorised into (2^33+1)(2^33-1). So all you need to know now is if those two factors are integers. If they are, 2^66-1 cant be a prime as it is divisible by more than 2 numbers (the others being 1 and the number itsself). 2^33 is an integer and adding/subtraction 1 doesnt change this.
Reply 19
Mr M
Oh I get it!

Duh.

Just factorising it is enough!

Bet the OP STILL doesn't understand though if he was trying to type numbers into his calc.


Ye im still a little confused but i think im getting there (slowly) basically factorisng it proves it is an even number which obviously can't be a prime number?

So what happens if the number is odd?

Latest