The Student Room Group

Most competitive degree in the UK?

Scroll to see replies

Reply 200
Applicant to place ratio is such a bad way to determine competitiveness. You could have a really high applicant to place ratio if your course is a really popular backup course. For example: If lets say your course is very popular as a backup (presumably because its easier to get in), a lot of people will apply. The program accepts a lot of people but very few choose to go because they got into their preferred choice. You end up with a very high applicant to place ratio.

On the other hand, if your course is not so popular (high self-selection rate), not many people apply. However, it is the 1st choice for many. In the end you will have a very low applicant to place ratio. A good example is Oxbridge medicine. Oxbridge medicine has a 6 to 1 applicant to place ratio, whereas nearly every other medicine course has a higher one ranging from 7 to 1 to 12 to 1. However, over 90% of those given an offer by Oxbridge end up taking that offer. So really applicant to place ratio is not a good indicator of a program's competitiveness.

A much better indicator is acceptance rate. i.e. number of applications: number of offers used in conjunction with matriculation rate i.e. number of offers:number of spots. A low acceptance rate and a high matriculation rate indicate a very competitive program.

To answer the post, there are many competitive degrees. I would offer medicine as a degree that is competitive across the board.
(edited 10 years ago)
ive heard that economics at some russel group unis like bristol has been touching 30-40 per place
despite it being phenomenally high, id assume half are substandard offer, a quarter are clearly aiming at oxbridge or lse or so
Many (but by for not all) Oxbridge courses.
Courses universities specialise in (Economics at LSE, Math at Warwick, Engineering at Imperial, and so on)
Its all about dat media studies


Posted from TSR Mobile
Medicine, Dentistry and Veterinary Science.
Original post by ukmed108
Applicant to place ratio is such a bad way to determine competitiveness. You could have a really high applicant to place ratio if your course is a really popular backup course. For example: If lets say your course is very popular as a backup (presumably because its easier to get in), a lot of people will apply. The program accepts a lot of people but very few choose to go because they got into their preferred choice. You end up with a very high applicant to place ratio.

On the other hand, if your course is not so popular (high self-selection rate), not many people apply. However, it is the 1st choice for many. In the end you will have a very low applicant to place ratio. A good example is Oxbridge medicine. Oxbridge medicine has a 6 to 1 applicant to place ratio, whereas nearly every other medicine course has a higher one ranging from 7 to 1 to 12 to 1. However, over 90% of those given an offer by Oxbridge end up taking that offer. So really applicant to place ratio is not a good indicator of a program's competitiveness.

A much better indicator is acceptance rate. i.e. number of applications: number of offers used in conjunction with matriculation rate i.e. number of offers:number of spots. A low acceptance rate and a high matriculation rate indicate a very competitive program.

To answer the post, there are many competitive degrees. I would offer medicine as a degree that is competitive across the board.


On the whole yes but this does mean Cambridge Maths
(11 applicants 9 interviewed and 5 offers per 2 places) wouldn't be ranked highly because 1,1 in STEP means large numbers of some of the countries brightest fail it.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending