What a load of rubbish about sexualities in genders being different to justify a lighter sentence. True, sexualities is different but sexual assault is sexual assault, and even if it was consenting, it's still underage sex. An erection doesn't mean consent either, any physical or sexual stimulation from someone else can cause that. If it really is over 300 times then perhaps there was an element of 'consent', but is probably the same in the instances of male teachers sexually harassing students, yet in that instance, the situation would be treated much more seriously since people somehow see it more morally wrong for some reason and legally speaking it is more serious since rape is constituted by penetration.
I wonder how many people would say "I bet the girl enjoyed it" if the genders were reversed? Stereotypes much?