Proposal for a Union of Islamic Nation

It was a joke, this union won't have many churches, i know what church and state seperation means.

Where you not there when this happend ?


1. you government is an Iranian proxy.
2. The majority of Iraqis are uneducated and listen to what their religious leaders tell them.
3. The shi'ites of Iraq already love Iran
4. like you said, 40% of iraqis, 40% is less than half.
5. Syria and lebonan don't have any conflicts, they are also Iranian Proxies.
6. wtf do you think an islamic union would mean? It would mean islamic countries could improve relations by increasing economically activity. It wouldn't mean forming a new country
7. WTF are you on about saudis population revolting if saudi arabia cooporates with Iran? you know nothing about the middle east, if it carries on at this rate, the saudis will revolt against their own government.

The arabic countries are all puppets and cowards. The arabic people are begining to open their eyes, and soon, you will see jordanians, egyptians and saudis revolting against their puppet governments.

nationalism is abhorrent in any form, pan-nationalism even more so.

I know and, excuse me if it sounds like I'm just 'pulling this out of my arse' here, why don't we create something whereby every human being on the planet stands to gain irregardless of creed, nationality, gender or race? Why the ******* hell do you have to base these kind of things on such arbitrary and fleeting things as a line on a map or some 'religious' doctrination?

Deliberately establishing an Islamic state would result in increased secularity of the state?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_church_and_state

well, how nuclear power will offer protection i dunno. if the us, uk, or china or even the uk invades any of those countries, i highly doubt pakistan would retailate with nukes. they have what? 2 nukes? how many has china got? a bizzillion.

I think the numpty meant the literal Christian Church.

Yes there is. You can't have one state that's based on two mutually exclusive foundations.

Care to learn some Politics or History?

It seems so
The video in your sig is excellent, by the way

Pakistan got its nuclear plans from North Korea...

Care to learn some Politics or History?

It seems so
The video in your sig is excellent, by the way

The problem with your analysis is that you're far less educated than the Iraqis. So if they're incapable of thinking for themselves, you're even less capable of thinking for them.

Neither Syria nor Lebanon are ran by Iran. Syria is more heavily influenced by Iran since it depends on Iranian funding, but it doesn't jump when Iran tells it to jump. The Shi'a parts of Lebanon might be heavily influenced by Iran, but most of Lebanon is not Shi'a. There is also massive resentment in Lebanon over the Syrian occupation of the place and the continued presence of Syrian intelligence services. Only someone with a great deal of education could make the ultra-simplistic claims that you made.

Thanks for the great come back. Are you going to say "and you" or "your mom" in your next response?

Oh and on the sub, when did that happen?