Please help me distinguish between these qualifications especially ACA and ACCA. most people conclude that they are the same but surely they are not. so what's the main distinguishing factor?
See the very first post in this forum, titled "Accountancy qualifications"? That might be a good place to start...
ACA. Offered: Almost entirely in practice, though there are a few audit based positions in industry and the public sector. Rarely offered outside the UK. Syllabus: Strong on tax, audit, financial reporting. Weak on finance, management accountancy, management theory. Centered around skills needed by practice: statutory work, and giving advice to external clients. Recognised qualification for statutory audit/insolvence.
ACCA. Offered: Offered in industry, practice and the public sector. Very strong internationally. Syllabus: Good all round, optional papers give you ability to customise qualification (and includes international papers): though not as strong on tax/audit as ACA, or finance/management as CIMA, whatever you choose. Qualification is more technical and less focused on particular working skills - e.g. no Case Study. Recognised qualification for statutory audit/insolvence.
CIMA. Offered: In industry and the public sector. Fairly strong international presence. Syllabus: Strong on finance, management accountancy, corporate strategy; weak on financial reporting, audit, almost no tax. More mathematical/financial than the other two, less focused on statutory aspects. Centered around working within a company to advise management. Some accounting careers options (statutory audit/insolvency) not open, others (financial reporting, internal audit) may be difficult to get into with this qualification, but on the other hand it's far stronger than the other two on MBAish aspects of the syllabus.
There's also the CA, from ICAS, which is very similar to the ACA in terms of scope and the standing of the qualification.
Im in need of a bit of advice!!
I have a job offer for an international company to do the ACA in london. However this is not top four.
I also have an offer for jp morgan doing the CIMA.
I first thought I wanted to do the ACA due to career prospects, and the company I have the offer for has great opportunities in terms of moving up the career ladder and overseas opportunities. Although I cant see me sticking to audit after im qualified. I can see me going into corporate finance roles and maybe even move into banking. I know most financial directors have the ACA, and i know thats a VERY long way off, but its something to aim for!
I dont really know much about the CIMA, as I was mostly applying to companies offering aca. Whats the difference between working in industry and practise?
At the minute its just the name of JP morgan thats confusing me!!
Any advice would be great ... im very confused at the moment!!
this helped me to understand the different qualiifications better in addition to the reply from Leederick above.
Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
Already a member?
Oops, something wasn't right
please check the following:
Not got an account?
Sign up now
© Copyright The Student Room 2015 all rights reserved
The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.
Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22
Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE