STEP I, II, III 2002 Solutions
Maths exam discussion - share revision tips in preparation for GCSE, A Level and other maths exams and discuss how they went afterwards.
| Announcements | Posted on | |
|---|---|---|
| Important: please read these guidelines before posting about exams on The Student Room | 28-04-2013 | |
-
Re: STEP I, II, III 2002 Solutionsgood times(Original post by Rahul.S)
you did that ques when you were in y12 :O
back before I had to worry about this university business. -
Re: STEP I, II, III 2002 SolutionsI think this solution is actually more in the spirit of the question....(Original post by z0tx)
I find the solution above relies less on guessing and is closer to the techniques hinted at in the exercise than the other one posted on this thread. -
Re: STEP I, II, III 2002 SolutionsHm... Yes you're right.(Original post by mikelbird)
I think this solution is actually more in the spirit of the question.... -
Re: STEP I, II, III 2002 Solutionson q2, the last part says "hence" what i did was spot that, it was the same as the sum above it but with r=0 which led me straight to pi/2(Original post by Dadeyemi)
Some more;
Did these quite a while ago I'm afraid some may be partial solutions. -
Re: STEP I, II, III 2002 SolutionsAbove from --- http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/show...1#post19333071
Maybe a correction here -- I'm not sure -- but I got a positive sign in the RHS of the second equation ---



Last edited by adrienne_om; 04-06-2012 at 19:42. -
Re: STEP I, II, III 2002 Solutions(Original post by adrienne_om)
Above from --- http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/show...1#post19333071
Maybe a correction here -- I'm not sure -- but I got a positive sign in the RHS of the second equation ---




-
Re: STEP I, II, III 2002 Solutions
Seems Paper II Q1 has a bad solution here:
http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/show...9#post18023769
No need to actually look at the question paper, Part ii) to this solution has some funky algebra!
The last few lines should be
The jump from the third line to the fourth still isn't all that clear but at least now it seems correct
EDIT: deleted my post below because I was wrong and the solution to Q2 seems correct.
Last edited by Xero Xenith; 11-06-2012 at 21:00. -
Re: STEP I, II, III 2002 SolutionsGood spot, fixed(Original post by Xero Xenith)
Seems Paper II Q1 has a bad solution here:
http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/show...9#post18023769
No need to actually look at the question paper, Part ii) to this solution has some funky algebra!
The last few lines should be
The jump from the third line to the fourth still isn't all that clear but at least now it seems correct
EDIT: deleted my post below because I was wrong and the solution to Q2 seems correct.
-
Re: STEP I, II, III 2002 SolutionsProbably being a bit stupid here but how did you go from 1-sqrt(1-cos^2 x) to 1-cos2x?(denominator line 1, to denominator line2), I think the sin^2(2x) has been replaced by sin^2x in line 1 accidentally. Ofcourse doesn't affect final answer, but could lead to a little confusion(Original post by Xero Xenith)
Seems Paper II Q1 has a bad solution here:
http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/show...9#post18023769
No need to actually look at the question paper, Part ii) to this solution has some funky algebra!
The last few lines should be
The jump from the third line to the fourth still isn't all that clear but at least now it seems correct
EDIT: deleted my post below because I was wrong and the solution to Q2 seems correct.
Last edited by Extricated; 12-06-2012 at 14:38. -
Re: STEP I, II, III 2002 SolutionsGood spot yourself, pretty sure you're right!(Original post by Extricated)
Probably being a bit stupid here but how did you go from 1-sqrt(1-cos^2 x) to 1-cos2x?(denominator line 1, to denominator line2), I think the sin^2(2x) has been replaced by sin^2x in line 1 accidentally.
Seems like there's still just a minor thing on the third line (the one with the three dots) - square root sign should be
not just
.
-
Re: STEP I, II, III 2002 Solutionsnah you are being stupid here(Original post by Extricated)
Probably being a bit stupid here but how did you go from 1-sqrt(1-cos^2 x) to 1-cos2x?(denominator line 1, to denominator line2), I think the sin^2(2x) has been replaced by sin^2x in line 1 accidentally. Ofcourse doesn't affect final answer, but could lead to a little confusion
-
Re: STEP I, II, III 2002 SolutionsWe're only interested in the direction.(Original post by yukki0822)
sorry im really confused that why does the modulus of r equal to 1? -
Re: STEP I, II, III 2002 Solutions
For II, Q10, I believe there's an error in the final part - the
should have an x attached, which makes the final answer 81/40. I also get this answer through an entirely different approach to the question:
Spoiler:Show



Differentiate implicitly:

When T is stationary,
, so 
Plug this back into the original equation:


This gives maxima/minima at T = 0 and T = 3. T = 0 is obviously impossible, so T must equal 3, as required.
For the second part, use a trapezium to calculate the final speed of the second competitor, and use this to work out the acceleration:

And so the acceleration is then
.
, which means that the speed in the second part is 14.5. Next, find the time when they are moving at equal speed, as this is when maximum displacement occurs:

This is greater than 0.75 so is fine. Then, calculate the distances for each:


Subtracting one from the other yields the final answer
Last edited by DJMayes; 17-03-2013 at 21:36. -
Re: STEP I, II, III 2002 SolutionsDoes this graph have an oblique asymptote?(Original post by SimonM)
STEP I, Question 4
Spoiler:Show

Therefore the equation of the tangent is
Since
is a solution

This gives us the equation,
We have
so the only intersections are 0 and 1.
We have
(given)
The area under the tangent is a trapezium with area

Since the graph is always above it, we get
which is what we want to show.
Considering the half closest to the y axis, and revolving it around that axis we get:
![\displaystyle \pi \int_{1/2}^1 x^2 \, dy = \pi \left [ \ln y - y\right ]_{1/2}^1 = \pi \left ( \ln 2 - \frac{1}{2} \right ) \displaystyle \pi \int_{1/2}^1 x^2 \, dy = \pi \left [ \ln y - y\right ]_{1/2}^1 = \pi \left ( \ln 2 - \frac{1}{2} \right )](http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/latexrender/pictures/54/541dd960a14ebcbdbf4025df17928a86.png)
and
![\displaystyle \pi \int_{1/2}^1 (2(y-1))^2\, dy = 4\pi \left [ \frac{y^3}{3} \right ]_{-1/2}^0 = \pi \frac{1}{6} \displaystyle \pi \int_{1/2}^1 (2(y-1))^2\, dy = 4\pi \left [ \frac{y^3}{3} \right ]_{-1/2}^0 = \pi \frac{1}{6}](http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/latexrender/pictures/13/130afc912c435cf8f887f3bef81457a5.png)
Therefore












