STEP 2003 Solutions Thread
Maths exam discussion - share revision tips in preparation for GCSE, A Level and other maths exams and discuss how they went afterwards.
-
Re: STEP 2003 Solutions ThreadNo worries. You may like to have a look here for some more codes that may not be on the TSR LateX page, but you are in need of(Original post by tommm)
Thank you, I shall remember that
-
Re: STEP 2003 Solutions Thread
I/13
Show that the given probability is true
Spoiler:Show
Let
and
be the results of team A and team B respectively.
The probability of each team scoring can be modelled by a binomial distribution:


The situation of neither side winning after the initial 10-shot period occurs when each team has the same number of success, or fails.
Let
denote the number of fails.

Therefore
as required.
Show that the expected number of shots is given by the stated expression
Spoiler:Show
My LaTeX is probably all wrong and I can't figure out the second part, but there's half a solution (I think), and it's my first one, so woo!Last edited by AnonyMatt; 18-04-2009 at 23:31. -
Re: STEP 2003 Solutions Thread
STEP II 2003 Q8
Spoiler:Show





Stationary values occur when
. We will use this in the original differential equation, so we obtain


Now, if
, then from our expression for y,
, which would lead to a fraction in our equation for
becoming infinite. Therefore, we disregard y = 0 as a stationary point.
Therefore, stationary points occur at
So
Therefore
as required.
When
as 
When
as 
I've used a graphing program to draw the two graphs. The first is in the case
; the second is when
. Note the location of the turning points.

-
Re: STEP 2003 Solutions Thread
STEP II 2003 Q5
Spoiler:ShowE = a/2, F = (p+b)/2, G = b/2, H = (p+a)/2 =>
EF = a/2+x[p+b-a]/2
GH= b/2+y[p+a-b]/2
for which there is a solution EF = GH = (p+a+b)/4 when x = y = 1/2
so we have s = (d+t)/2 = (p+a+b)/4 so the position vector of T is t = (p+a+b)/2-d
the plane OAB is the x-y plane i.e. z = 0 so the component of T in the k direction is 0, so considering the vectors in the k direction we have: 0 = n/2-d <=> d = n/2
Last edited by Dadeyemi; 25-05-2009 at 12:13. -
Re: STEP 2003 Solutions Thread
STEP III, 2003, Question 7
Spoiler:ShowThe line through A and B is given by
. PN is perpendicular to this line, and so has gradient
.
The equation of the line through P and N can therefore be written
, which is satisfied by
, giving
.
Solving simultaneously gives
, and
as required.
The line through P and N is given by
.
Therefore, for N to lie on this line:

Rearranging gives the required result
and
are the gradients of BP and AP respectively. Therefore, for N to lie on XY, BP and AP must be perpendicular. Last edited by Daniel Freedman; 03-05-2009 at 18:50. -
Re: STEP 2003 Solutions ThreadGenius. I spent an hour getting two geometrical proofs, which are actually quite nice, but so much more complicated to find. I attatched one I scanned in, the other is similar. Your method is really neat though.(Original post by tommm)
STEP II 2003 Q2
Spoiler:Show

Let
We find, using the usual method, that
Therefore

Now remembering that
, and multiplying both sides by 3, we achieve the required result.
For the second part, by comparison with the first, we want to find an equation of a similar form that leads to

Using a bit of guesswork, we find that this equation is

which is satisfied by
Rearranging
, we get:

and remembering that
leads to the required result.
-
Re: STEP 2003 Solutions ThreadVery nice. In STEP, if there's two parts, you usually have to apply the method from the first part to the second part.(Original post by toasted-lion)
Genius. I spent an hour getting two geometrical proofs, which are actually quite nice, but so much more complicated to find. I attatched one I scanned in, the other is similar. Your method is really neat though. -
Re: STEP 2003 Solutions ThreadI like what you've done, though I would have never attempted to come up with that myself.(Original post by toasted-lion)
Genius. I spent an hour getting two geometrical proofs, which are actually quite nice, but so much more complicated to find. I attatched one I scanned in, the other is similar. Your method is really neat though.
I'm pretty sure Tom's way is the way you're expected to do it.Last edited by Daniel Freedman; 04-05-2009 at 12:36. -
Re: STEP 2003 Solutions ThreadHmm... yuk! Consider the area of the sector OGH and the triangle OGH, subtracting to get the segment. Nice perseverance, but it's actually pretty easy.(Original post by tommm)
STEP II 2003 Q4
Spoiler:Show
The required area is given by
, which can be seen from drawing a diagram[/latex]
Upon using the substitution
, and some manipulation with the cosine double-angle formula, we get
(N.B. that represents limits of integration)
The difficulty in evaluating this lies in the evaluation of
. First, using the sine double angle formula, we get

By drawing a suitable right-angled triangle, we find that
and from this we can find the required result.
Are you sure we want the distance to the edge and not to the centre? We had d as the distance to centre before. I got:(Original post by tommm)
STEP II 2003 Q4
Spoiler:Show
To find the area in the three listed cases, we note that i) and ii) are both specific versions of iii), therefore we need only find the answer to iii) and i) and ii) follow easily.
From a diagram, we see that we must replace d with the perpendicular distance from the line to the furthest point on the circle from the line. This gives us:
, where D is the shortest distance from the origin to the line. The distance from a point (x, y) to the centre is given by

But the point (x, y) lies on the line y = mx + c, therefore

To find the minimum value of D, we must differentiate this expression and set it equal to 0. This gives us


substituting this back into our expression for D^2, we get

and therefore, to find the new area, we must modify (*) such that

The answer to i) follows by letting m = 0; the answer to ii) follows by letting a = b = 0.
for (i)
(note the x-coord of the centre is irrelevant)
for (ii)
(perpendicular distance)
for (iii)
(perpendicular distance again)
and I just plugged these straight into the equation from the first part. As you noted (i) and (ii) follow from (iii), but I'm sure they put them in that order for a reason (ie to give you bite-sized chunks of the overall thought-process). Please tell me if I made a mistake
P.S. You got a stray /latex tag :P




![= \dfrac{1}{n(n-1)} \left [ \displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^n \displaystyle\sum_{s=1}^n rs - \displaystyle\sum_{s=1}^n s^2 \right ] = \dfrac{1}{n(n-1)} \left [ \displaystyle\sum_{r=1}^n \displaystyle\sum_{s=1}^n rs - \displaystyle\sum_{s=1}^n s^2 \right ]](http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/latexrender/pictures/f1/f17aac436d17d751c54a0f5dfef31331.png)

![R= \displaystyle \int^{\pi}_0 Sin\left( \frac{\pi x}{2}\right) dx = \left[\frac{-2}{\pi}cos\left( \frac{\pi x}{2}\right) \right]_0^2 = \frac{4}{\pi} R= \displaystyle \int^{\pi}_0 Sin\left( \frac{\pi x}{2}\right) dx = \left[\frac{-2}{\pi}cos\left( \frac{\pi x}{2}\right) \right]_0^2 = \frac{4}{\pi}](http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/latexrender/pictures/64/64c4a0352efdb0557d38534f2702edf1.png)


don't think I've ever done that on a paper before.

