Ok - far be it for me to to detract from the fun of inter-university or inter-collegiate rivalry... However, I think some things need to be kept in mind.
1) The huge variation in a particular institution's ranking from one table to another, and from one year to another should be decent evidence of the inherent subjectivity of these tables, or more accurately the subjectivity of which metrics are seen as relevant, and the respective weight to be given to each.
2) As such, some of the standards used will be entirely irrelevant to you... they are not to the purpose.
3) The tables themselves and their supposed accuracy tend to be championed by those who are pleasantly content with their own university's ranking. Indeed - it isn’t unknown for someone to sing the praises of a league table one year, only to attack its accuracy another simply due to a change in position of their favoured Alma Mater.
**************
NOW. When determining which university you wish to attend - the logical thing is to approach it in the following way:
"WHAT ASPIRATIONS DO I HAVE FOR MYSELF; WHAT AM I DOING THIS DEGREE WITH A MIND TO?"
**************
Now, not everyone will be thinking of a career in the law, or indeed, a career at all. So there are a variety of possibilities:
1. You wish to do the degree simply due to an interest in the subject
2. You want the degree, and then plan to do something entirely unrelated and for which the degree will have no worth.
3. You want to tell people you are doing law - but couldn’t care less what happens beyond that.
Clearly nos. 1-3 will render the choice of university one based largely on your personal preference as to the: campus, atmosphere, location, nightlife, housing, etc etc... but the academic credentials of the University will be off less importance. I would assume that this does not apply to many here.
4. You hope to go on and become an academic (teaching)
5. You hope to go into research
Here – you may well have more reason to pay attention to the academic reputation of the university – with a focus on the research ratings in the different tables. Again though – these should not be taken as Gospel, but can be factored in in a way that they might not be when the goal is otherwise.
6. You want to become a solicitor - anywhere will do - you don’t really like the notion of the "city"
7. You want to become a Barrister but not at a top set
8. You want to go into another career, but not at the highest level.
9. You want to become a Solicitor in a MC or US firm
10. You want to become a barrister at a top chambers
11. You wish to use the degree as a launch pad into a non-legal career, such as IBanking, or Consultancy - both at the top of those respective industries.
For Nos. 6-8, most of the respectable universities will do. For a solicitor’s job – you should be looking at a university within the top 30-35 in the country… but for a pupilage you should aim a bit higher. However, there will be no need to go to Oxbridge, with a LLM from Harvard.
However, nos. 9-11 (which the majority here seem to have in mind) will require you to be more selective. However – when it comes to determining WHICH university to go for – the league tables, as stated, will be of little help. Here – the real importance is WHAT DO THE EMPLOYERS IN QUESTION PREFER. Time and time again there are ubiquitous discrepancies between this list and the league tables. However the question itself is easy to answer – and the answer is somewhat predictable (though it must be made clear that this is not a scientific ranking):
(Each group in no particular order):
Oxford
Cambridge
KCL
LSE
UCL
Nottingham
Durham
Bristol
Manchester
Birmingham
Warwick
(to a lesser extent):
Newcastle
Southampton
Leicester
Exeter
Within these groups there is really negligible preference demonstrated by employers. Obviously an applicant from Cambridge will beat out one from UCL, all things being equal. The problem is, things rarely if ever ARE equal in a relevant sense. Indeed, people from Oxbridge often seem to be under the misconception that a mid range 2:1 of theirs will be favored to a 1st from Durham or KCL. This is not the case.
As such, it is important to realise that by far the most important factor in finding a top job (assuming you make it into the first 3 groups) will be your grades, followed by extra-curricular activities, and finally your institution.
This tends to render arguments about which university is better than another largely irrelevant to the purpose most have in mind. Concentrate on your grades, and it won’t matter what the Times, Guardian, or even New of the World says.
And with that – I leave you to return to the rivalry.