If you had any attention you would notice you sought to attack other degrees first, rather than me attacking management. Look at university courses across the board and management is known to not be a classical and traditional course. If we look at politics, law, journalism you will notice the vast majority of successful people have traditional subjects, whether it be in the arts (like those you deride, English, History and Languages) or the sciences, rather than business or management. How many successful bankers do you think would have management degrees, not many is the answer.
The way I look at it, I am interested in history, where do the best academics and specialists work? Thats right in university. Where do the best managers and business people work? In business where they make money, not at universities. For many of your courses apparently the lecturers barely speak English, and if you look at the rankings management simply is not as well respected as English, History and Physics for example. One of the reasons some have given for Royal Holloway's slip down the rankings is because they have begun to slip down the overall rankings (from 12th when I applied with three A's at A-Level) to its current ranking is because of the money and concentration it now applies to the Management department rather than the Universities traditional stronger subjects.
History really is anything but irrelevant by the way my friend, and frankly anyone who suggests it is an ignorant idiot, but there you go.
Im anything but a troll, just providing the facts. Talking of facts, got any evidence to suggest that Management really does have the highest employability rate? It may be true I suppose, but most of these statistics dont take into account that many do in fact get jobs after univeirsty not in graduate jobs, but in retail and indeed in Fast-Food service.