Darn, I can't post as Anonymous..
I am not proud of it, sort of.. well, I am, which is why I want to post. But it's not a good thing and I would have done things differently if I could go back.
I have never really done any revision for any subject. For the last few years I've done barely any work - relatively low attendance and no homework.
For the closed text English exam AS (Dickens' Hard Times) I did no practice essays and I didn't read the book.. I only read chapters 1-5 and the last chapter, then I just flicked through the middle of the book picking up random quotes for about an hour before the exam. I got a high A.
I have never used York Notes or anything like that.
For Fascist History I missed most of the lessons on Consolidation of power. Just before the exam I realised I knew too little about it and that it might come up. I skim read some stuff on it for about an hour. The exam happened to be on consolidation... I got a high A.
I did GCSE graphics as a twilight course in year 10, we only had 8 lessons and 4 of those were messing around for 30 minutes then going home. I did the coursework (60% of the GCSE, normally takes the best part of two years) in only one week [with only 3 hours sleep over the course of 7 days, literally, 30 minutes each morning before school]. I did most of the learning for the two exams in 1 hour lessons before the exams themselves. I got an A.
Those are probably the worst (or best depending on how you look at it) examples.. I have to admit, going into an exam knowing you aren't nearly as prepared as you should be is a bit of an adrenaline rush.
I don't do quick revision, I do quick learning.