[Bagration]

He's been removed.

[Matthew_Lowson]

Ok - As you'll agree I never came across him in the 14 months I was in the party.

and any response to my reply to Grant

[tucker672]

[ukebert]

Good good.

[Bagration]

I approved 81 new members the other day and didn't have time to check their credentials, assuming any unworthy members could just be removed if they weren't compatible. I assume logic123 was one of them and he's been removed so... the system works!

Matt : I'm not going to involve myself in this any further.

[Matthew_Lowson]

So - we have a tolerance of dishonesty. Surely Grant you will admit that your election is tainted even though you played no role.

[Afcwimbledon2]

(Original post by Bagration)
I approved 81 new members the other day and didn't have time to check their credentials, assuming any unworthy members could just be removed if they weren't compatible. I assume logic123 was one of them and he's been removed so... the system works!

81?

How many are active?

If they aren't I'll send to chop off their:
s

[Bagration]

(Original post by Afcwimbledon2)
81?

How many are active?

If they aren't I'll send to chop off their:
s

Who knows. It's too early to tell, I think.

[Afcwimbledon2]

(Original post by Bagration)
Who knows. It's too early to tell, I think.

Yes well...

[Don_Scott]

(Original post by BruceTaylor)
I'm not sure of the order, but it seems member Logic123 is a member of two parties, yours and the PCP. Can I ask why your party or the PCP didn't bother checking?

I just accepted him yesterday evening.

I didn't check because he had applied quite a while ago and I had delayed making a decision. When he applied he wasn't a member of any party and I assumed that it had remained that way when I accepted his request.

[answermaquestion]

Labour

[Afcwimbledon2]

(Original post by answermaquestion)
Labour

Is their a question you would like to ask the Tories?

[History-Boy]

(Original post by Bagration)
I approved 81 new members the other day and didn't have time to check their credentials, assuming any unworthy members could just be removed if they weren't compatible. I assume logic123 was one of them and he's been removed so... the system works!

Matt : I'm not going to involve myself in this any further.

****** hell that's a lot of new members...... hhmm ........ I wonder how many dupes there are in that bunch

[Afcwimbledon2]

(Original post by History-Boy)
****** hell that's a lot of new members...... hhmm ........ I wonder how many dupes there are in that bunch

About 81

[Matthew_Lowson]

I wouldnt actually ask a question, because from what I've seen is that they have a leader who sidesteps an urgent issue, a deputy leader so ignorant when presented with evidence and a member who has deceived, cheated and lied and rather remarkably is tolerated. - A member of the Tories came and wished me well, which shows that the issue which Baggy retreats from is one of concern to members of the party.

[Matthew_Lowson]

(Original post by Afcwimbledon2)
About 81

You get my email

[Afcwimbledon2]

(Original post by Matthew_Lowson)
You get my email

Which account?

[Matthew_Lowson]

hotmail

[Afcwimbledon2]

(Original post by Matthew_Lowson)
hotmail

No - resend to:

Afcwimbledon2@aol.com

(which is my proper email account)

[paperclip]

(Original post by Afcwimbledon2)
No - resend to:

Afcwimbledon2@aol.com

(which is my proper email account)

If you're gonna post an e mail address use 'at' rather then the @ symbol, there are many bots that search the internet for somewhere to spam.