I mentioned the Phillip's Curve in the last Question but didn't draw it out, would i lose marks? I also didn't draw the AD and AS curves :|
For Costs of Inflation i reffered to unemployment and the disposable income increasing/decreasing. Loss of marks once again?
For the first question on paper one, did anybody put Capital and Labour for the Factors of Production for Air travel?
For paper 1, I put labour and land. I wasn't too sure because I read through the passage like 3 times and couldn't see where it stated a factor of production -_-.
For paper 1, I put labour and land. I wasn't too sure because I read through the passage like 3 times and couldn't see where it stated a factor of production -_-.
My logic was you need Capital to buy the Aircraft, the Buildings etc, and you need the Labour to pilot aircraft and man the terminals.
What did you put for the determinants of demand for air travel? I blanked completely and put Cost and Trends :|
The Phillip's Curve shows the inverse relationship of Unemployment and Inflation, so I thought i would include it as we had to show the effect of AD upon both of those factors.
Our invigilator told us all of our work had to be in a single booklet and we were not allowed extra paper so i had to cram all of my writing into two pages, didn't leave me room for a diagram sadly ):
The Phillip's Curve shows the inverse relationship of Unemployment and Inflation, so I thought i would include it as we had to show the effect of AD upon both of those factors.
Our invigilator told us all of our work had to be in a single booklet and we were not allowed extra paper so i had to cram all of my writing into two pages, didn't leave me room for a diagram sadly ):
That's so not fair. The 2 pages isn't enough - especially for a diagram! I went onto 2 extra pages..
Oh I remember now for the determinants of demand I did price and quality!! I screwed up PED did price over demand and got 0.7, but hopefully still get marks for explanation seeing as its still normal, elastic, one increases other decreases etc!!
For the supply side one. rise in government spending on education and training raises labour productivity and skills so higher quality of labour. This increases the price and quality competitiveness of domestic goods. So demand for exports and hence export revenue is likely to increase.
comments: takes a long to have effect - takes time for people to come through education process and enter labour force. more exports generates income and some of this may be spent on imports. If increases in exports are matched by increases in imports, the effect on the current account will be neutral can be exspensive, government may have to reduce spending on eg healthcare Full marks? Got first question wrong but apart from that I cant see where ive gone wrong
7/7 without a doubt
That's more or less what I put, minus the expensive part.
paper went quite well una.. smiles all rround... apart from not knowing how many 0 are in a billion loool. so i missed 1 marks since i put the formula!!!!!
but uno the last question the wording was abit funny. although i tlked about expansionary fiscal.. run by budget deficit and expansionary monetary policy.. how it can onli solve cyclical unemployment not structual and frictional etc etc. how these expansionary polices have trade off cause it casues inflation etc etc. blabbed on.. although didnt write as much as i would of liked. wrote 3 and a bit sides..
Are teachers aloud to see the paper? In January none of mine saw them until well after the exam
But basically: - Increases in AD increase output as long as there is spare capacity - More people will need to be employed to make the new output - At the elastic bit of the AS curve, there will be little or no inflation - As the economy nears full capacity the inflationary danger increases.
but uno the last question the wording was abit funny. although i tlked about expansionary fiscal.. run by budget deficit and expansionary monetary policy.. how it can onli solve cyclical unemployment not structual and frictional etc etc. how these expansionary polices have trade off cause it casues inflation etc etc. blabbed on.. although didnt write as much as i would of liked. wrote 3 and a bit sides..
The thing is, it wasn't talking about government policy.
47/60 for an A is quite reasonable. It's, what, 78 per cent or so?
yh boundaries r most likely to be high. you needed 47 OUT OF 60 to have got an A in january
Is that suppose to be high? 47/60 is like 78%
On the last question on paper one, It was worded abit weird for me not sure for others.
It said something like "Dicuss if taxation is the most effective solution for market failure arising from negative externalities"
I only wrote about taxation but wasn't sure if it is asking for tradable permits/subsidy/or solutions. Since it ask if its the most effective solution.