Controversial 'Capello Index' Ratings Revealed
Football discussion forum.
| Announcements | Posted on | |
|---|---|---|
| Enter our travel-writing competition for the chance to win a Nikon 1 J3 camera | 21-05-2013 | |
-
Controversial 'Capello Index' Ratings Revealed
http://www.teamtalk.com/news/2483/62...player-ratings
Er, do we actually need these ratings? I think we can tell the team were crap
I think Capello's gone a bit mental tbh.
Anywho Jermain Defore was our best performer, Green the worst. -
Re: Controversial 'Capello Index' Ratings Revealed
Here's the link btw:
http://www.capelloindex.com/en/ -
- Reputation:
- Vengeful, Imperial Overlord of The Student Room
- Location: Southampton/Oxford
- Posts: 3,872
Re: Controversial 'Capello Index' Ratings RevealedI don't have a clue how it works, but... I disagree with a lot of the ratings, e.g. Upson being higher than Ashley Cole, when Upson was pretty much diabolical against Germany save for his goal.
-
Re: Controversial 'Capello Index' Ratings Revealed
Someone hand the man a sport psychology book.
Also, this:
It is, however, worth pointing out that Defoe's average score of 62.47 still falls some way short of the 65.77 awarded to Uruguay's talismanic frontman Diego Forlan, the man rated as the best player at the tournament by Capello.
-
Re: Controversial 'Capello Index' Ratings Revealed(Original post by CombineHarvester)
It works using some formula so it's not going to be accurate.
I think the formulas are meant to be objective. Just look at the Castrol rankings. They sound like **** but are objective. And every run, pass, shot etc is taken into account. -
Re: Controversial 'Capello Index' Ratings RevealedYes but it doesn't take into account a lot of factors which the index doesn't measure. For example Klose is higher than Xavi which statistically makes sense because the index values goals more than other stats but most would argue Xavi was better despite not scoring. There are loads of players ranked higher than Ozil as well but most would regard him as being one of the best players of the tournament.(Original post by S-man10)
I think the formulas are meant to be objective. Just look at the Castrol rankings. They sound like **** but are objective. And every run, pass, shot etc is taken into account. -
Re: Controversial 'Capello Index' Ratings Revealed(Original post by CombineHarvester)
Yes but it doesn't take into account a lot of factors which the index doesn't measure. For example Klose is higher than Xavi which statistically makes sense because the index values goals more than other stats but most would argue Xavi was better despite not scoring. There are loads of players ranked higher than Ozil as well but most would regard him as being one of the best players of the tournament.
I know what you mean. Its put Klose above Villa.