|
31-07-2009: 31st July 2009 21:57
|
#1
|
|
|
|
Benevolent Member
Thread Starter
|
|
 |
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Staines
|
|
King's or Surrey?
I am in a bit of dilemma as to whether I should apply to King's College London or the University of Surrey.
I'm interested in Molecular Genetics @ King's
and (if I change my aim from biosciences to computing) Computer Science.
I have recently become interested by Chemical and Bio-Systems Engineering @ Surrey
and (if I change my aim) Electronics and Computer Engineering.
OK so in terms of reputation, King's probably beats Surrey (I mean Surrey was a polytechnic - come ooon...). Also in general rankings, King's is 12th and Surrey is 37th (Times Good Uni Guide).
However, in terms of subject-specific rankings:
King's (Biological Sciences): 25th
Surrey (Chemical Engineering): 4th (!)
If you think I should compare them in the same category as Biological Sciences then even there Surrey is 7th.
And King's (Computer Science): 31st
Surrey (Electronic Engineering): 4th (!)
If you think I should compare them in the same category as Computer Science then even there Surrey is 11 places ahead of King's. In Electro Engineering King's was so bad the entire department is being shut down!!
Now I don't place much weight on rankings but clearly Surrey is performing waaay better in the criteria they use to rank the unis.
Moreover, if you get AAB or above at A Level, Surrey will give you a GUARANTEED £1000 scholarship A YEAR and DOUBLE the Bursary amount for which you are eligible, up to £4000!! This makes it one of THE most generous financial packages, and kicks King's pathetic £1350.
Am I misguided in considering Surrey over King's just for those reasons (the courses seem equally OK)?
Sorry for the length and plethora of figures!
|
|
|
| Register to remove banners from posts. |
|