|
|
Revision:Adjective endings (German)
From The Student RoomTSR Wiki > Study Help > Subjects and Revision > Revision Notes > German > Adjective endings Welcome to the crash course in German adjective endings. Admit it; you don't like learning tables full of endings, do you? Me neither. One of the most startling aspects of the German language is its amazing regularity and logic, and adjective endings (often taught as tables of 48 different endings with various complicated explanations as to when to use which) are no exception. Well, this is the real explanation: three simple rules, a few remarks and plenty of examples, and it'll all make perfect sense to you (or your money back). For this explanation you don't need to know much other than what an article is, what an ending is, and the endings of der/die/das (which you should get to grips with over the course of learning German).
Rules
Simple, yes? (Exception: when the article is 'ein', in which case see rule 2. Also see remarks below.)
RemarksThat's all. And it's easier even than that: there is a huge underlying logic underneath all these rules. The 'exceptions' aren't really exceptions when you know why and how all the above works, which is what I'll explain to you here. Essentially, if there has been some sort of grammar conveyed by a non-trivial ending (and by 'trivial' I mean the really easy ones in the table in rule 1) on an article, the adjective (being a naturally lazy species) doesn't need to bother. If there hasn't been any grammar conveyed, then the adjective needs to do the work by taking an ending as specified in rule 2. Obviously, if there's no article then it hasn't conveyed any grammar, so the adjective will have to do so by taking an ending; 'ein' doesn't convey any grammar because it has no ending, so you need a non-trivial adjective ending as in rule 2, but 'eine', 'einem', 'einen' all do, so you just use the throwaway endings in rule 1, because the 'ein-' ending conveys some grammatical meaning, and the adjective is lazy and can't be bothered to. (See how my 'exception' in rule 1 wasn't really an exception now?) This gives rise to one more small 'exception', mentioned in rule 2: 'der Preis kalten Biers'. As expected, though, it's not really an exception; even though there's no article there doing the '-es' genitive-y bit, there is an '-s' on the end of 'Bier'. So again the adjective doesn't need to do any work, because something else has already conveyed some grammatical meaning for it. Examples
SummaryAdjectives are lazy. They're trying to do the least amount of work possible, so whenever there's an article or a related word around that has an ending and therefore conveys some grammatical meaning, they just take one of the easy endings as given in the table in rule 1. They also slack off when there's an 's' on the end of a genitive, like "Biers", regardless of whether there's an article or not. But when there's no article (or an article like "ein" which doesn't have an ending), they're happy to take the ending of the relevant form of the article; if there's more than one adjective qualifying the same noun, they'll all take the same ending, so one adjective conveying grammatical meaning doesn't mean the next one will be lazy; this will only happen when an adjective follows an article (or related word) taking one of those endings. |















