Revision:Art 230 - Standing For Non-privileged Applicants In Particular Areas

TSR Wiki > Study Help > Subjects and Revision > Revision Notes > Politics > Art 230 - Standing For Non-privileged Applicants In Particular Areas

Court arguably more liberal in some areas of the law than in others.

(a) anti-dumping cases-

objective of the anit-dumping regulations is to prevent non-MS from selling goods into the EU at a low price to the detriment of traders within the MS.

3 types of applicatns in such cases: the firm bringing the accusatns, the producer of the goods, the importer of the goods. Problem is that the anti-dumping measures must be imposed by regulatn and not by decisn. Therefore if the ECJ holds that the regulatnis in fact not a regulatn then it is arguable whether the Commn has any pwr to impose the regulation.

Timex case, the complainant firm was accorded standing in order to challenge the level of anti-dumping.

Allied case, producers and exporters could also be regarded as d & i. c.

Position is rather more complex with the case of importers. As can be seen by Extramet case.

(NB the above may not be required)

Comments