Register  
 
About Us | Help | Sign in
 
   

Revision:Financing the State

From The Student Room

TSR Wiki > Study Help > Subjects and Revision > Revision Notes > History > Financing the State


  • Many problems of state and consequent social difficulties lay in needed for tax revenue and problems in its collection. Some scholars believe in extra taxation which aided decline and extortion.


  • Finlay model that urban areas no centres for industrial production – markets and profit underdeveloped. Hopkins and indeed Finlay now place more emphasis on increased monetarization and level of trade. 2nd century- low level of economic growth. Higher level of prosperity in the Eats and more long-term exchange.


  • General assumptions about ancient economy, no reason to doubt not applied to later empire
    1. Roman Empire – wealth largely form the and, state revenues and army consisted of the majority of the budget. Other expenditure extremely limited.
    2. Extent of monetarization low – and coinage for political or military value not economic or commercial.


Hopkins argues for increased economic growth – factors, were they present in later Roman Empire?

    1. Increased amount of land under cultivation
    2. Greater population size – more division of labour and consequent growth in non-agricultural production, higher productivity per capita – attributed to peacetime more workers as less involved in wars
    3. Government exaction and government expenditure acted as stimulus to economic growth


  • These approximations from –200 to 200 – in the later period in the West less land as settlement and war – less taxes available – population may actually have dropped – also displaced by settlers. West saw war in this period and fragmentation of territory, obvious consequence of damage to land and urban centres. Cost of manpower etc.


  • Clear from Hopkin that West may have suffered economic decline – even before Barbarian settlement.


  • Natural facto and disruption of land-based empire may have caused a reduction in raw materials.


  • Positioning of army in towns as opposed to frontiers would have lessened spread of coinage and payment in kind operated with estate-to-estate trading.


  • Not doubt a large army post-Diocletian, but Joes’ idle mouths exaggerating and Dicoletian probably reinforce status quo as opposed to huge expansion.


  • Huge cost of the army may not be the reason. Reason that it had huge borders to protect. Eastern empire had better strategy – pay Arabian allies to defend it, presence of army acted as an economic stimulus adding roads and infrastructure as well systems of transport and local support.


  • Regional variations in late antique economy as well as intervention of external factors. Difficult to compute cost of the army. Taxes still fell mainly on agricultural production – government had little recourse in response to loss of land and shortage of manpower – apart from repeated legislation to keep coloni to land.


  • Tax collector – hated and very dangerous figure i.e. not paying taxes.


  • Regressive taxation and almost entirely land based – did not tap trade or senatorial income. Sign of privilege was tax exemption. Eastern Empire seemed more successful in collecting taxes.


  • Inequitable and disorganised mess – especially anonna tax in kind for military – distribution problem, getting it a problem and calculating what had to be given was inaccurate.


  • Grain requisitioning from Africa and Egypt to capitals problematic – who got grain w sa corruption and when those lands taken there were problems.


  • By 6th century payment in gold was the norm – pounds or solidi the norm. Inflation always and at some points little difference between solidi and copper-metal coinage. 491-518 more successful in introducing stability. Collection of taxes in kind and fluctuation in value against solidi cannot but have depressed the market.


  • Monetary policy of the Romans also poor – East did better an economy continued to function – were they in West? Revenues maintained in East. Yes local difficulties, famine, pestilence etc but all normal things and could be contained – whereas eternal factors, settlement and demographic change a different matter all together.


Comments

collapse
Recent Threads
 
collapse Something that slightly confuses me is ....
started by: Anonymous
replies: 2
last post: 1 Minute Ago
collapse Willly and Water
started by: Happy Kid
replies: 6
last post: 1 Minute Ago
collapse Would you take a bullet for a friend?
started by: Aeon Prince
replies: 30
last post: 1 Minute Ago
collapse Taking notes into Cambridge Interview
started by: nigel_s
replies: 4
last post: 1 Minute Ago
collapse Imperial with these GCSE grades
started by: Crabman
replies: 0
last post: 1 Minute Ago