TSR Wiki > Study Help > Subjects and Revision > Revision Notes > Mathematics > Indices
Positive powers
A long time ago, someone noticed that multiplying a number by itself took up quite a lot of space, and decided to define a new operation called exponentiation. It's easiest to explain with an example:
The basic idea is to multiply the number at the bottom (the base) by itself until you have a product of length equal to the number at the top (the index or exponent).
should be read as "Two to the four", or "Two to the power of four" if you're feeling posh. In general:
This isn't on the syllabus, but here's an equivalent definition you might find helpful if that's unclear:
Basic identities
Now, three major identities hold. They're obvious when you think about them, but they're still pretty important.
For example,
.
For example,
.
For example,
.
Common pitfalls
Now, this isn't too difficult, but people often make two mistakes. The first one is to assume that because
and
can be simplified easily, so can
and
, where
. Wrong. They can only be simplified if
is a power of
or vice versa. So, for example:
can't be simplified.
can be simplified.
The second one is to assume that
. They look equal, but they really aren't. For example:
See what I mean?
Zero and negative powers
Now, some bright spark noticed that the division identity above only worked for
, and decided to define exponentiation for zero and negative exponents. Obviously, the key consideration when doing something like that is to make sure that zero and negative exponents behave as much like positive exponents as possible - that is, make them obey all three of the above identities. He eventually settled on the following definition for
:
for all x.
I know, not an intuitive definition, right? But it's the only sensible definition under which all three identities hold:
As for negative integers, it turns out from the division identity that the only sensible definition is:
Again, all three identities hold:
This also renders the identity
redundant, since dividing by
is the same thing as multiplying by
. For this reason, sometimes
is known as the law of exponentiation.
Rational powers
But of course, this wasn't enough! Someone decided that integer powers were so good they might as well generalise to rational powers - in other words, fractions. As before, the key thing was to make sure that all the old identities worked. Assuming they do, then:
So the obvious choice for
was:
Then we have:
It turns out that both our identities hold, so we can take this as our definition. You might want to skip the proofs, though - they're a little messy, and they're not on the syllabus. Here they are anyway for completeness:
[Unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula. Error 6 ]
[Unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula. Error 6 ]
Complex powers
It's possible to define exponentiation for irrational exponents like
, and complex exponents like
, but this is beyond the scope of A Level.
Summary of Identities
[Unparseable or potentially dangerous latex formula. Error 6 ]
Examples
Comments
This article is currently only suitable for A Level students and above. Perhaps as separate article for GCSE students (or maybe just foundation GCSE students is needed#) which starts more basically and has none of the latter stages.
Alternatively, it could be noted here that the latter sections are only needed for Higher GCSE/A Level maths.