Revision:OCR Core 2 - Factors and remainders - The Student Room
The Student Room

Revision:OCR Core 2 - Factors and remainders

TSR Wiki > Study Help > Subjects and Revision > Revision Notes > Mathematics > OCR Core 2 - Factors and remainders


Contents

8. Factors and remainders

Factorising quadratics

Although in many cases it is rather easy to factorise quadratics, it is not always so easy. As the coefficients become larger, the process can become very difficult, and therefore it is desirable to have some form of method to the factorising process by which one can be sure that one will not be wasting time by checking factors which one does not necessarily need to check.

Consider the idea that one has a quadratic:

 p(x) = (nx + a)(mx + b)

Consider  x = \frac{-a}{n} .

In this case:

 \displaystyle p \left( \frac{-a}{n} \right) = 0

Also, one can consider:

 x = \frac{-b}{m}

 \displaystyle p \left( \frac{-b}{m} \right) = 0

This has significance as one can say that:

For a quadratic function  p(x) , if  \displaystyle p \left( \frac{-a}{n} \right) = 0 ,  (nx + a) is a factor.

This is called the extended factor theorem for quadratics.

There is a more specific, and simple version of this theorem:

Consider  p(x) = (x - a)(x - b)

 p(a) = 0

 p(b) = 0

For a quadratic function  p(x) , if  p(a) = 0 ,  (x - a) is a factor.

This is the factor theorem for quadratics.

Both of these ideas can be used in order to speed up the process of factorising a quadratic.

After one has a single factor, one can find the other, as one knows that the constant value of the quadratic is formed by the multiplication of the two constant values of the factors, and also that the coefficient of the  x^{2} term is formed by the multiplication of the coefficients of the "x" terms in the factors. One can deduce the second factor from these observations.

Equating coefficients

If one is aware of one factor, one can use a method called equating coefficients to find the other, corresponding factor.

This method is often useful in situations where one is dealing with higher-degree polynomials, but the same idea applies to all polynomials.

Consider:

 p(x) = ax^{2} + bx + c

If  p(d) = 0 ,  (x - d) is a factor, and therefore one knows that there must be some factor such that:

 (x - d)(Ax + B) \equiv p(x)

Hence:

 Ax^{2} + (B - d)x - dB \equiv p(x)

From this one can calculate the values of "A", and "B", and therefore the other factor.

This method can be applied whenever one knows one of the factors.

One might notice that the identity symbol is used, this is because the two sides are equal for all values of "x".

One can prove that this system works.

 ax^{2} + bx + c \equiv dx^{2} + ex + f .

 p(x) = ax^{2} + bx + c

 p(0) = c

 p(1) = a + b +c

 p(-1) = a - b + c

 q(x) = dx^{2} + ex + f

 q(0) = f

 p(0) = q(0) (Due to the identity)

Therefore:

 c = f

 q(1) = d + e + f

 p(1) = q(1) (Due to the identity)

 d + e + f = a + b + c

Hence:

 d + e = a + b

Also:

 p(-1) = q(-1) (Due to the identity)

 a - b + c = d - e + f

Hence:

 a - b = d - e

Now (summing these simultaneous equations):

 2a = 2d

 a = d

 b = e

Hence the equation of coefficients is correct.

Factorising cubics

Often one will need to factorise a cubic (many times this will be in order to find the x-axis intercepts of a cubic function, or the stationary points of quartic function).

All the methods which applied with the quadratics will apply with the cubics.

Example

1. Factorise the following:

 x^{3} + 3x^{2} + 3x + 1 .

One merely states that:

 p(x) = x^{3} + 3x^{2} + 3x + 1

 p(-1) = 0

Hence  (x + 1) is a factor.

Hence:

 (x + 1)(Ax^{2} + Bx + C) \equiv p(x)

A = 1, B = 2, C = 1

Hence:

 (x + 1)(x^{2} + 2x + 1) \equiv p(x)

Now one can attempt to factorise the quadratic:

 (x^{2} + 2x + 1) = q(x)

 q(-1) = 0

Hence  (x + 1) is a factor.

 (x + 1)(Dx + E) \equiv q(x)

D = 1, E = 1

Hence:

 (x + 1)(x + 1)(x + 1) \equiv p(x)

Division of polynomials

One will have come across the concept of a remainder regarding the division of constants, however the same idea applies to polynomials.

If one was to attempt to equate the coefficients with an expression that was not a factor of the polynomial, one would obtain inconsistent results.

For example:

 p(x) = x^{2} + 2x + 1

 p(1) = 1 + 2 + 1 = 4

Therefore  (x - 1) is not a factor.

 (x - 1)(Ax + B) \equiv p(x)

 Ax^{2} + (B - A)x - B \equiv p(x)

A = 1, B = -1, but that means that  (B - A)x = -2x , this is the inconsistency.

One needs to bring in the idea of a remainder.

Instead of equating the coefficients in the usual manner, add a variable for the remainder.

 (x - 1)(Ax + B) + R \equiv p(x)

 R - B = 1

 B - A = 2

 A = 1

 B = 1

 R = 4

Therefore:

 p(x) \equiv (x - 1)(x + 1)  + 4 .

(One might notice that the remainder is equal to the value of  p(1) , this will be discussed later in these notes).

One can say that when one has a polynomial divided by a linear polynomial, one will be left with another polynomial (the quotient) and a remainder (which might be 0).

Hence:

 p(x) \equiv (ax + b)q(x) + R

As one is dividing by a linear polynomial,  q(x) will have a degree which is one less than that of  p(x)

The remainder theorem

As one has seen, if  \displaystyle p \left( \frac{a}{b} \right) = 0 ,  (bx - a) is a factor of  p(x) .

It is now useful to consider the significance of this figure during the process of dividing two polynomials, and taking the remainder.

Take the general form of the resultant expression after a division by a linear polynomial:

  p(x) \equiv (ax + b)q(x) + R .

As this is an expression of identical equality, one can choose any number for x, and the equality is preserved.

One wishes to isolate the "R" term in this explanation, and therefore it would be useful for either  q(x) = 0 , and/or  (ax + b) = 0 . As one is aware of the value of  (ax + b) it is easy to ensure that this is 0.

 x = \frac{-b}{a}

Hence:

 \displaystyle p \left( \frac{-b}{a} \right) = 0 \times q \left( \frac{-b}{a} \right) + R = R

Hence, if one applies the polynomial "p" to the value of x which makes the linear polynomial zero, one obtains the remainder.

(This explains why one obtained the same value [previously] for the remainder as one did for  p(1) ).


Also See

Read these other OCR Core 2 notes:

  1. Trigonometry
  2. Sequences
  3. The binomial theorem
  4. The sine and cosine rules
  5. Integration
  6. Geometric sequences
  7. Exponentials and logarithms
  8. Factors and remainders
  9. Radians
  10. The trapezium rule
Discussions Toggle
Paramedic Practice/Science-2012 Entry
started by: WannabeParamedic
forum: Healthcare and Nursing
replies: 1730
last post: 1 Minute Ago
What game are you currently playing?
started by: Ape Gone Insane
forum: Gaming
replies: 3042
last post: 1 Minute Ago
Half angle - equation
started by: Ayakashi
forum: Maths
replies: 0
last post: 1 Minute Ago
Second racist gang attacks on white man by "asians"
started by: Zeffy
forum: News and Current Affairs
replies: 47
last post: 1 Minute Ago
The Uni Study Thread Mk II
started by: Aemiliana
forum: Student Life
replies: 494
last post: 1 Minute Ago
SNOW
started by: meeow
forum: News and Current Affairs
replies: 353
last post: 1 Minute Ago
Southampton Medical School 2012 Applicants
started by: noneoftheabove
forum: Medical Schools
replies: 1710
last post: 1 Minute Ago
Fast Stream 2012
started by: coolh5000
forum: Public Sector
replies: 1042
last post: 1 Minute Ago
Would You Like To Encounter Yourself On The Internet
started by: Nice Marmite
forum: Advice on Everyday Issues
replies: 21
last post: 1 Minute Ago
32e boobs- too big!
started by: Anonymous
forum: Health
replies: 38
last post: 1 Minute Ago
Advanced Higher Chemistry 2011-2012 :: Resources and Discussion Thread
started by: Hype en Ecosse
forum: Scottish Qualifications
replies: 88
last post: 1 Minute Ago
01753 841906 ???
started by: Nix-j-c
forum: Advice on Everyday Issues
replies: 21
last post: 1 Minute Ago
Dentistry Interviews 2012 entry
started by: EmmaW94
forum: Dentistry
replies: 2936
last post: 1 Minute Ago
Who's going to Abertay?
started by: DenkMit
forum: Dundee Unis
replies: 210
last post: 1 Minute Ago
Guilty Pleasures!
started by: TheRandomer
forum: Music
replies: 12
last post: 2 Minutes Ago
Should you feel DOMS with every workout
started by: da_comeback
forum: Fitness
replies: 5
last post: 2 Minutes Ago
Student Finance Applications - Q & A
started by: EagleHawk
forum: Student Financial Support
replies: 6247
last post: 2 Minutes Ago
BA Education Studes
started by: sahararawr
forum: University of Derby
replies: 2
last post: 2 Minutes Ago
Economics Applicant Thread UCAS 2012
started by: Tateco
forum: Economics
replies: 8213
last post: 2 Minutes Ago
Veterinary Medicine Graduate Applicants 2012
started by: schizopear
forum: Veterinary Medicine
replies: 363
last post: 2 Minutes Ago
Article Updates Toggle
Medicine Applicants Stalking Page 2012 Entry
edited by: -Simon-, 12 Minutes Ago
KCL 2012 Applicants Stalking Page
edited by: sweet77, 15 Minutes Ago
Modern Language Offers 2012
edited by: Fosteeer, 20 Minutes Ago
Law Offers 2012
edited by: Natmay93, 39 Minutes Ago
Geography Offers 2012
edited by: bm127, 1 Hour Ago
Pharmacy Offers 2012
edited by: qasidb, 2 Hours Ago
LSE Applicants Stalking Page 2012 Entry
edited by: BigBlackDog, 3 Hours Ago
Neuroscience Offers 2012
edited by: Mattyphillips5320, 3 Hours Ago
Lancaster Applicants Stalking Page 2012 Entry
edited by: vedderfan94, 3 Hours Ago
Oxford Applicants Stalking Page 2012 Entry
edited by: chocopops, 4 Hours Ago
Contact Us | Site Rules | Staying Safe on TSR | Advertising | Staff Blog | Essays & Coursework | Terms & Conditions | Top
Customise your TSR | Life Advice | Hobbies and Interests | Debate and Current Affairs | Study Help | University and University courses
Universities and HE Colleges | Careers, Employment and Gap Years | General Discussion

Customise your TSR