|
|
Revision:Regional Inequalities
From The Student RoomTSR Wiki > Study Help > Subjects and Revision > Revision Notes > Geography > Regional Inequalities Regional Inequalities Main causes of inequalities:
EuropeProblem Regions:
Growth Regions:
Hot BananaArea covering Europe’s core areas. It stretches from SE England, through N France, the Rhine, the Ruhr & into Milan. This zone attracts company HQs and R&D and accounts for 40% of EU total output.
Brazil – LEDCOriginally, under Portuguese rule the NE of Brazil was the wealthiest region based on plantation crops. Therefore Brazil’s first capital was Salvador as it was a major port. However, now the wealthiest region (the core) is the SE around Sao Paulo due to industrialisation, urbanisation & the creation of jobs. This area has 64% of the country’s wealth. This area first developed due to coffee growing & gold & diamonds mining. This was followed by Iron-ore mining, which led to the growth of a steel industry. HEP provided cheap power & so the region became a centre of commerce, education & administration. Therefore the area has the highest standard of living in the country & receives most foreign & government investment due to acquired advantages. In the Periphery of Brazil most people are subsistence farmers. However the soils are poor & there is frequent drought. The region is over-populated & so often there is not enough food for everyone. There is very little HEP and so there is a lack of energy, putting off industry. The lack of jobs has led to the migration of 1000s to the SE.
UK – MEDCCauses of regional inequality:
Assisted areas used to cover much of the UK except the Midlands, E Anglia & the SE. However, now much less help is provided & it is spread more around the UK. There is now some help for areas of London as well as the traditional areas of Scotland, the NE & S Wales. This help has caused inequalities to drop in the UK but there is still an inequality between N & S.
Italy – Deprived MEDCThere is a large disparity between N & S with unemployment 4x greater in the S than in the N. These problems have been made worse by economic recession. Problems in the S:
Reasons for divide:
Cassa per il MezzogiornoThere is a dual industrial policy to attract industrial giants e.g. Fiat & small artisan companies e.g. furniture makers. Growth poles were set up to attract industry with the hope of initiating the multiplier effect to cause sustainable development. There were also generous government grants & tax incentives. Although there has been some success on the Adriatic Coast the policy has failed. Plants such as Alfa Romeo did set-up but these were only branch plants, which never developed links to the local economy & created relatively few jobs. Measures have not been at all effective in reducing regional inequality. A lot of money has been spent but has had little effect in establishing an industrial base. The area is over-dependent & incapable of self-generating growth. Emphasis has instead shifted to the selective encouragement of small & medium sized firms.
Third ItalyThis has become prosperous & successful as it has created industrial districts with lots of small firms. High levels of education & communication, low land prices and good local enterprise, have also helped the area.
Also SeeOther Development revision notes for this module at A Level:
CommentsThese notes were originally written by F1_fanatic and posted here on TSR Forums. They are suitable for people studying for geography at A Level. |
















