|
Join The Student Room TodayBe part of the UK's largest and fastest growing student community. It's free to join and a lot of fun - Get inspired, express your ideas, interact and share STEP III 1990 question 3 solutionFrom The Student RoomTSR Wiki > Study Help > Subjects and Revision > Mathematics > STEP > STEP III 1990 question 3 solution i) Given: (1): (2): (3): From (1) and (2), by mutliplying by (4) (5) Multiplying (3) by
and then subbing in (4) and (5) into RHS gives
as required.
Then, (1) Multiplying by
from which it follows that
But by using the exact same argument, only swapping c and d, we get that
from which it follows that
as required.
Given: (1) First part: Induction on s: Statement: (2) The case s = 1 is merely the given (1). Assume (2) is true for s = k, i.e.
Left multiplying by (1):
i.e. the statement is true for s = k + 1 as well, and thus is true by induction for all natural s. By instead using induction backwards, multiplying by
Known (from the last part): For any integer m, (1) Now use induction on n: Statement:
Assume true for n = k:
Now let
which proves the statements is true for n = k + 1 as well, and by induction blah blah..., as required. Solution by ukgea. |
|