Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 & 2

Does anyone else find Bonnie Wright to be a horrible actress? She seems so cold and stiff.

Yes!! I found the whole "will you do up my dress" bit horrible too. The whole cinema laughed when she came out with that line!

Well, funny you should say that. About three weeks before the film came out me and my friend were debating when it would end and i got it right! I said

I liked the way they ended it, couldn't have chosen a more suitable stopping point IMO. Anything prior to shell cottage is way to in-depth and non-stop to have a break in.

Yes!! I found the whole "will you do up my dress" bit horrible too. The whole cinema laughed when she came out with that line!

I laughed all the way through that...least sexy scene ever. Why can't they just get the girl who plays Amy Pond to play Ginny? Ginny was supposed to be sexy and sassy and awesome.
Sigh.

I cannot wait to see this!! I'm quite excited!!!
Won't be watching it in 3D though.

I know It was just as bad in the 6th film too!

However, they did choose the actors when they were around 10. I guess it's difficult to know what people will turn out like as actors when they're older, and they can't change them now :/

Neither will anyone else, since it hasn't been made in 3D

Second part comes out 2 days after my birthday

Neither will anyone else, since it hasn't been made in 3D

Second part comes out 2 days after my birthday

On the contrary I thought very little was 'unneeded'. All of the book is relevant to the main plot so they had a very difficult job cutting anything really. As for adding things that weren't in it whatsoever, they did it sparingly. The scene with harry and Hermione dancing is a great bit of cinema which I thought was really sweet :')

The books are amazing. It may be your opinion that they suck but they are part of the best-selling book series of all-time so they can't really be '****ty'.

Part 1 and part 2 were necessary. Unlike the other books which had sub plots, the whole 7th book is dedicated to the main plot so they couldn't cut much out at all. So unless they wanted to make a 4 hour movie that nobody could be bothered to sit through and came out rushed they needed to split it up. Also making it into two parts has given the end of the book it's own feel which the book itself achieves. In the book there is a clear change between everything leading up to Gringotts and everything that unfolds immediately afterwards.

It was about 2hrs 15 mins I think, but it went by sooooooo quickly! They could have added it bit more to make it 2hrs 30 like the last film.

Are you for real? Oh yes, if it has won awards and sold well.. Surely it means it can't be bad!

Edit: What on earth? Did you feel offended by that?

Firstly lets not forget a book is written for a fan base. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it isn't well written. Meyer wrote great books for the fans she was aiming at. Therefore they are well written which is displayed by their incredible sales.

Did i feel offended by what?

Read my sig...

Highest selling books =/= good books.
Charles Dickens sold far less copies than J.K Rowlings yet can you compare the two?
Heck Sir Walter Raleigh one of the greatest Reinessance writers sold far far less copies than Twilight.Can you compare his work with that crap however?