I have always said that it is a spurious thing to be "proud" of one's nationality. I enjoy living in Britain, I enjoy the water, which is far better than what we drink in Lagos, Nigeria, and all of my best experiences have been in this country. I could think of no other place I would rather live, and, to quote Andrew Marr, "despite all its setbacks, it still remains, in the 21st century, a fantastic stroke of luck to be British." But I think that 'pride' is a dangerous word to use.
Chinua Achebe implied in his poem 'Vultures' that it was the deepest love of one's country and family which drove the Nazi commandant at Belsen to order the atrocities that he did. I wholly agree with him, and would like to use that as an example of the broader issue raised by jingoism- that claiming one's own country is the best, a form of arrogance first of all, can lead to the development of hierarchy between nations. Was it not this same attitude which led to the formation of our empire? (I believe Cecil Rhodes used this as the justification for taking the former Rhodesia) The extreme right in this country believe they have hijacked true conservatism by saying that they protect British values. That seems like a justification for oppression of minority groups to me, to those who can't be said to espouse "British" values. That phrase can be bent to mean anything.
I'd like to ask a question of people on TSR. How can anyone in 2010, where no country's culture is its own but is instead an amalgam of everywhere else's, where lines of race and ethnicity are blurred, where it is difficult in some cases to trace the precise location of a practice or saying to a nation, call themselves British? We are, arguably, as American (our music, our films), or Chinese (every good in your household) or African/Carribean (where 30% of the premiership is Black) as we are British. Speaking of society as "British" would require us to look at certain aspects of it and decide where current social norms concerning that aspect come from. As I've just suggested, many of those origins will be outside of these isles.
Gordon Brown, an incredibly intelligent man, tried to tackle the difficulty of defining precisely what the term meant by speaking of values long connected by connotation to the word, but did, imo, a poor job. Not because he didn't think it through but because the topic is far more nebulous, far more clouded, than people give it credit for.
In short (sorry for the rant) I can be proud of the things that my country has produced, I can be proud of the things that my country has done, but I cannot be proud of my country just because it is my country.