The Student Room Group

Exponential decay help

.......
(edited 13 years ago)
Original post by sam2109
hi people im not sure if im doing these right or wrong, inputted will be appreciated:
The half life of caseium is 42 years,
calculate the K for Caseium
i got Ln0.5 / 42 = 0.0165? is it right

the next questionalculate the percentage of the original caseium that remains after 100 years?

i got 5.21



next question is calculate the time it takes for the amount of casium to fall 5% of its original value.
i done ln0.05 / 42 - 181.56 hrs

can anyone correct me please


t1/2 = 0.693/k

k = 0.693/42 = 0.0165 :smile:

Nt = N0e-kt

So, when t = 100

proportion remaining = e-kt = 0.192

100 * Nt/N0 = 0.192 * 100 = 19.2%

checksum -------------------------------------------------------------------

One half life decreases count by 50%

42 year half life in 100 years makes 2 and a bit half lives = between 12.5 and 25% - therefore reasonable answer.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If it falls to 5% then Nt/N0 = 0.05

e-kt = 0.05

-kt = -3

therefore t = 3/0.0165 = 181.6 years

checksum -------------------------------------------------------------------

5% falls between four and five half lives (50%, 25%, 12.5%, 6.25%, 3.125%)

four half lives = 4 x 42 = 168 years
five half lives = 5 x 42 = 210 years

Therefore 181.6 years is reasonable :smile:
Reply 2
........
(edited 13 years ago)
Original post by sam2109
thanks very much for helping identify my answer.
i would like to know how u got 19.2%?, show me the procedure, once again thnaks for ur help


I've shown you the working!

You start with the decay equation:

Nt = N0e-kt

This says that the activity at time = t is equal to the activity at time = 0 (the initial activity) multiplied by the term e-kt

You simply rearrange this and substitute in the values for t and k.

You are told that time t = 100

You have already worked out k = 0.0165

You assume that N0 is 100% activity (it's the initial value)

So you can work out Nt
Reply 4
......
(edited 13 years ago)
Original post by sam2109
i get a different answer
0.693*2.718^-0.0165*100 =13.3???????????


I don't know where you get this from! Why have you multiplied by 0.693 (ln2) - it doesn't appear in the equation.

If you work out 'kt' first you get 0.0165 x 100 = 1.65

Therefore e-1.65 = Nt/N0

0.192 = Nt/N0

So if N0 is taken as 100% then Nt = 19.2%

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do you understand my checksum?

If you do one for your answer (13.3%)

Half lives give a percentage remaining according to the number of half-lives passed:

1 half-life = 50%
2 half-lives = 25%
3 half-lives = 12.5%

Your value of 13.3 is very close to 12.5 and so you would expect just less than three half lives to have passed. But 3 x 42 = 126, which is much larger than 100 (more than a half half-life bigger). It makes your answer very improbable (wrong)

It is always worthwhile looking for a way of estimating the probability of an answer being reasonable (checksum) to give confidence in your answer and to make sure you haven't made a mistake in your assumptions or calculations.
(edited 13 years ago)
Just a shame there isn't a Cs isotope with a 42 year half life!

Quick Reply

Latest