The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1
A couple of suspended accounts wont stop the DDoS, it just creates more targets.
Reply 2
None of your links work apart from the first one.
Reply 3
Original post by F i s
None of your links work apart from the first one.


OH NOES THEY ALL BEEN DDOSED BY TEH ANONYMOUSE!!!1l
Reply 4
Original post by fire2burn
A couple of suspended accounts wont stop the DDoS, it just creates more targets.


How will they effectively organise distributed attacks without a few minority groups going rogue? They aren't all from 4chan, there are only a few in the IRC and there's no other easy way for the hive to communicate than with Twitter.
Reply 5
Original post by broderss
oh noes they all been ddosed by teh anonymouse!!!1l


dude we gotta get outa here now! Lapd could be round the corner!
Reply 6
been ddosing visa for a while now. lolololol hacksaws
I'm all in favour of wikileaks vision, but Anonymous are playing into the US governments hands, it gives them the perfect excuse to censor the web.
Damn you Twitter and Facebook!

I would do a mini-protest and boycott you both, but both so addictive :frown:
Original post by Broderss
How will they effectively organise distributed attacks without a few minority groups going rogue? They aren't all from 4chan, there are only a few in the IRC and there's no other easy way for the hive to communicate than with Twitter.


There are plenty of ways to communicate on darknets such as eepsites, and there is no way to control/censor them.
(edited 13 years ago)
Original post by Broderss
How will they effectively organise distributed attacks without a few minority groups going rogue? They aren't all from 4chan, there are only a few in the IRC and there's no other easy way for the hive to communicate than with Twitter.


You don't need to organise anything.

The man who started the attacks on wiki was DDOS'ing 10Gbits a second, and he was working all on his own.
Original post by jolteon
been ddosing visa for a while now. lolololol hacksaws


Admitting to illegal activity isn't a particularly wise move.
Reply 12
Original post by TommyWannabe
You don't need to organise anything.

The man who started the attacks on wiki was DDOS'ing 10Gbits a second, and he was working all on his own.


Isn't a DDOS then is it.
Reply 13
Original post by TommyWannabe
Admitting to illegal activity isn't a particularly wise move.


yeh itd be pretty stupid. almorst as stupidd as beleviating some thing on the internet.

or am i
Reply 14
Original post by broderss
isn't a ddos then is it.


are you imprying you cannot distrubute amongst yourself and no others?????
Original post by Broderss
Isn't a DDOS then is it.


I'm not great with this hacking business but could they mean although he was working alone, he had control over a load of other infected computers which he was using to carry out the DDOS?
Reply 16
Original post by jolteon
are you imprying you cannot distrubute amongst yourself and no others?????


yes
Original post by Broderss
Isn't a DDOS then is it.


You should probably read up on what a DDOS actually is.

You can do them with 1, 50, or a million people.
Reply 18
Original post by TommyWannabe
You should probably read up on what a DDOS actually is.

You can do them with 1, 50, or a million people.


come at me bro
Reply 19
Original post by Broderss
come at me bro

evraebody chill the **** out i got this.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending