The Student Room Group

Line integrals

:frown:

I must integrate CFdr\int_C \vec{F} \cdot d\vec{r}

where C is given by parametric equations x=t4x = t^4, y=0y = 0, z=t2z = t^2 and F=xzi^+z2j^+x2k^\vec{F} = xz\hat{i} +z^2 \hat{j} + x^2 \hat{k}

Haven't got a clue :s-smilie:
What's your definition of a line integral?
Also, where does t vary between?
Reply 2
Original post by Glutamic Acid
What's your definition of a line integral?
Also, where does t vary between?

Well since the vector field isn't conservative, I'm not sure.

What t varies between can only be seen from the fact the line integral is between (0, 0, 0) and (1, 0, 1) which I forgot to mention for some reason
Reply 3
This is some of my working:

drdt=<3t2,0,1>\frac{dr}{dt} = <3t^2, 0, 1>

Thus CF.dr=C<xy,z2,x2>.<3t2,0,1>dt\int _C \vec{F} . d \vec{r} = \int _C <xy, z^2, x^2> . <3t^2, 0, 1> dt

Is this near right?
Reply 4
Anyone understand where I'm going wrong?
Original post by Dagnabbit
This is some of my working:

drdt=<3t2,0,1>\frac{dr}{dt} = <3t^2, 0, 1>

Thus CF.dr=C<xy,z2,x2>.<3t2,0,1>dt\int _C \vec{F} . d \vec{r} = \int _C <xy, z^2, x^2> . <3t^2, 0, 1> dt

Is this near right?


You said "C is given by parametric equations x=t4x = t^4, y=0y = 0, z=t2z = t^2" so I'd check this bit <3t^2, 0, 1> if I were you.

Once you've done that, express x, y and z in terms of t, do the dot product and integrate between your limits.
(edited 13 years ago)
Reply 6
Original post by Dagnabbit
:frown:

I must integrate CFdr\int_C \vec{F} \cdot d\vec{r}

where C is given by parametric equations x=t4x = t^4, y=0y = 0, z=t2z = t^2 and F=xzi^+z2j^+x2k^\vec{F} = xz\hat{i} +z^2 \hat{j} + x^2 \hat{k}

Haven't got a clue :s-smilie:


You were wrong with the drd\vec{r}
CFdr\int_C \vec{F} \cdot d\vec{r}
As F=xzi+z2j+x2k\vec{F} = xz\vec{i} +z^2 \vec{j} + x^2 \vec{k}
r=t4i+0j+t2k\vec{r}= t^4\vec{i} +0 \vec{j} + t^2\vec{k}
So your integral
C(t6i+t4j+t8k)d(t4i+0j+t2k)=\int_C (t^6\vec{i}+t^4\vec{j}+t^8\vec{k})\cdot d(t^4\vec{i}+0\vec{j}+t^2\vec{k})=
C(t6i+t4j+t8k)(4t3i+0j+2tk) dt=\int_C (t^6\vec{i}+t^4\vec{j}+t^8\vec{k})\cdot (4t^3\vec{i}+0\vec{j}+2t\vec{k})\ dt=
t1t2(4t9+2t9 dt=t1t26t9 dt\int^{t2}_{t1} (4t^9+2t^9\ dt=\int^{t2}_{t1} 6t^9\ dt
Original post by ztibor
You were wrong with the drd\vec{r}
CFdr\int_C \vec{F} \cdot d\vec{r}
As F=xzi+z2j+x2k\vec{F} = xz\vec{i} +z^2 \vec{j} + x^2 \vec{k}
r=t4i+0j+t2k\vec{r}= t^4\vec{i} +0 \vec{j} + t^2\vec{k}
So your integral
C(t6i+t4j+t8k)d(t4i+0j+t2k)=\int_C (t^6\vec{i}+t^4\vec{j}+t^8\vec{k})\cdot d(t^4\vec{i}+0\vec{j}+t^2\vec{k})=
C(t6i+t4j+t8k)(4t3i+0j+2tk) dt=\int_C (t^6\vec{i}+t^4\vec{j}+t^8\vec{k})\cdot (4t^3\vec{i}+0\vec{j}+2t\vec{k})\ dt=
t1t2(4t9+2t9 dt=t1t26t9 dt\int^{t2}_{t1} (4t^9+2t^9\ dt=\int^{t2}_{t1} 6t^9\ dt



I also worked out the answer but I knew better than to post it.
(edited 13 years ago)
Reply 8
Original post by Get me off the £\?%!^@ computer
I also worked out the answer but I knew better than to post it.


Surely
Original post by ztibor
Surely
Indubitably.

Quick Reply

Latest